On August 4, 1892, a horrific crime of seismic proportions sent shockwaves through the headlines. An elderly New England couple bludgeoned to death in their own home, a covert killer at large, a nation captivated by the unfolding investigation. At the center of it all was the victims\u2019 32-year-old daughter\u2014implicated by presupposition and suspicious circumstance\u2014whose inquest testimony and subsequent criminal trial transpired into one of the most prolific unsolved murders in American history. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie Borden was born on July 19, 1860, in Fall River, Massachusetts\u2014a bustling textile town located along the Quequechan River. She was the youngest of three children to Sarah and Andrew Borden. The couple\u2019s first child, Emma, was born in 1851, while their middle daughter, Alice Esther (b. 1857), passed away from hydrocephaly at the age of two. On March 26, 1863, Lizzie\u2019s mother died of \u201cuterine congestion,\u201d now believed to be complications from an ectopic pregnancy. In the immediate months after Sarah\u2019s death, Emma assumed the maternal role, raising young Lizzie and helping Andrew with household responsibilities. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On June 6, 1865, Andrew Borden married 37-year-old Abby Durfee Gray\u2014a spinster laywoman whose family owned several profitable businesses around town, though she possessed little affluence herself. The new family dynamic was anything but cordial. The Borden sisters rejected Abby as their stepmother and mockingly addressed her as \u201cMrs. Borden\u201d to articulate their repudiation. Deep-seated resentment festered within Emma and Lizzie, convinced that Abby was after their father\u2019s assets, and moreover, their inheritance. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The son of a Yeomen farmer, Andrew experienced a modest upbringing. He began his career as a lowly carpenter\u2019s apprentice, nearly impoverished, but eventually prospered in casket sales and furniture manufacturing. By the late 1800s, Borden managed numerous commercial properties, directed several textile mills, and served as President of the Union Savings Bank. Andrew\u2019s net worth in 1890 was approximately $300,000, roughly $11.5 million today. Yet despite his wealth, Andrew maintained a parsimonious reputation. Instead of living amongst the Fall River elites on \u201cThe Hill\u201d\u2014the city\u2019s most fashionable neighborhood\u2014Andrew established his family home at 92 Second Street, mere steps away from working-class tenements and industrial commotion. The Borden residence also lacked electricity and indoor plumbing, contemporary contrivances for upper-class families. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie sought the affluent lifestyle of Fall River\u2019s upper echelon; however, Andrew\u2019s frugality restricted her participation in such \u201cfrivolous pursuits.\u201d Notwithstanding these limitations, Lizzie remained active in the Fall River social scene. She was involved in the Christian Endeavor Society\u2014teaching Sunday School to immigrant children at the Central Congregational Church\u2014and deeply invested in the Women\u2019s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), a progressive feminist group that advocated for women\u2019s suffrage and social reform. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n While outwardly philanthropic, Lizzie\u2019s self-indulgent desires became increasingly hard to repress. She was implicated in several shoplifting events around town; however, these infractions were never publicly disclosed and Andrew allegedly compensated store owners for their missing merchandise. In June 1891, the Borden house was robbed at midday. One hundred dollars and some of Abby\u2019s jewelry were missing, but nothing else outside the master bedroom was disturbed. Andrew filed a police report, only to abruptly call off the investigation three weeks later. Rumors swirled that Lizzie was the culprit, and much like the shoplifting incidents, any discipline was levied internally. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n In 1887, tensions between the Bordens intensified after Andrew allocated Abby’s sister, Mrs. Bertha Whitehead, $1,500 to retain title of their family home. Emma and Lizzie were infuriated by their father’s partisan generosity (which was not immediately disclosed to them) and demanded rectification. Andrew abashedly agreed to deed his daughters a house on Ferry Street for one dollar. During the summer of 1892, the sisters sold the property back to Andrew for five thousand dollars. They subsequently vacationed in New Bedford, Massachusetts\u2014Lizzie returned home in late July while Emma visited some friends in neighboring Fairhaven.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On the morning of August 3, the entire Borden household was blighted by a severe gastrointestinal illness. Andrew and Abby spent the twilight hours furiously vomiting while Lizzie only complained of minor symptoms. Much to the chagrin of Andrew\u2019s penny-pinching tendencies, Abby consulted their neighbor and family physician, Dr. Seabury Bowen, about the abrupt ailments. Abby expressed concern about intentional poisoning, but Dr. Bowen, exercising logical skepticism, reassured her that the true culprit was a food-borne illness, most likely caused by old mutton stew or improperly stored swordfish. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n As the Bordens recuperated that evening, John Vinnicum Morse, Lizzie and Emma\u2019s maternal uncle, made an unannounced visit to the residence. He joined the family for dinner (as much as they could stomach) and settled into his overnight accommodation on the second floor. While Andrew and Abby entertained John, Lizzie met with Alice Russell\u2014a close friend and distinguished member of the Congressional Church\u2014to discuss recent events. Lizzie detailed the suspected poisoning and forebodingly speculated that \u201csomeone will do something\u201d to harm her family. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n It was another mundane summer\u2019s morning at 92 Second Street. The Bordens\u2019 live-in maid, 25-year-old Bridget Sullivan\u2014whom Lizzie and Emma called \u201cMaggie,\u201d a disparaging term for female Irish immigrants\u2014served breakfast to Andrew, Abby, and John around 7 am. Lizzie remained in her bedroom upstairs\u2014her absence from family meals was commonplace given the tense household atmosphere. After mealtime, Andrew and John retired to the sitting room, where they discussed property dealings for nearly an hour, while Abby assisted Bridget with housekeeping duties. John left the premises at 8:45 am; Andrew followed suit sometime after 9 am for his morning walk. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n After cleaning the kitchen, Abby directed Bridget to wash the home\u2019s windows inside and out. The poor maid barely tended to the ground floor panels before she was overcome by nausea and rushed outside to vomit\u2014induced, perhaps, by a combination of the oppressive August heat and previous day\u2019s intestinal distress. At 9:30, Abby proceeded to tidy up the second-floor guestroom where John had slept the night before. Sometime during the next hour, Abby Borden was bludgeoned to death. According to the subsequent forensic investigation, Abby was facing her killer at the time of the attack. She was initially struck with a sharp instrument in the left temporal region, causing her to turn and fall face-first onto the floor. The killer then delivered eighteen additional blows to the back of her head. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Bridget reentered the Borden home around 10:20 am, already fatigued and weakened by the day\u2019s arduous chores. Andrew returned ten minutes later, but found himself locked out. He knocked. Bridget hastened to the front door and struggled to open it herself. A mischievous giggle bellowed from the second floor. Believing it to be Lizzie\u2019s condescending utterance, Bridget did not turn to see who it was. When Andrew finally entered the house, he laid down on the couch. Lizzie greeted her father a few minutes later. Andrew asked where Abby had gone. His daughter replied, \u201cMrs. Borden received a note from a sick friend and left the house sometime ago.\u201d Content with Lizzie\u2019s answer, Andrew settled down for a midmorning nap. Bridget, still feeling unwell, decided to do the same in the third-floor servant\u2019s quarters. Just before 11:10 am, Bridget awoke to Lizzie\u2019s distressing call; \u201cMaggie, come quick! Father\u2019s dead. Someone came in and killed him.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie directed Bridget to fetch Dr. Bowen from across the street. The maid ran over, but could not locate the doctor. Lizzie sent her away again, this time to find Alice Russell. The Bordens\u2019 watchful neighbor, Adelaide Churchill, witnessed Bridget\u2019s distraught manner as she hurriedly exited the home. A concerned Mrs. Churchill ran into the home and found Lizzie standing expressionlessly next to Andrew\u2019s mutilated corpse slumped over on the couch.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Dr. Bowen arrived five minutes later. He examined the bloody pulp that once composed Mr. Borden\u2019s face. His nose had been completely severed and one of his eyes split directly in half; his facial profile, a concavity\u2014the result of ten or eleven violent blows. The lack of defensive wounds indicated that the victim was asleep when attacked. Andrew\u2019s blood continued to ooze from every cephalic orifice during Dr. Bowen\u2019s inspection, placing time of death around 11 am. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n While the immediate turmoil revolved around Andrew, witnesses soon realized that Abby was unaccounted for. When asked of her stepmother\u2019s whereabouts, Lizzie relayed the same story\u2014that Abby left to see a sick friend\u2014but remarked \u201cshe may have returned a while back.\u201d An uneasy ambience hung over the household as bystanders attempted to locate the missing woman. Mrs. Churchill and Bridget ascended the front staircase to check the second floor. About halfway up the flight, the women turned to the left\u2014their eyes level with the floorboards\u2014and spotted Abby\u2019s lifeless body opposite the guestroom bed. Dr. Bowen inspected Mrs. Borden\u2019s corpse amidst the renewed commotion. Her blood was already congealed, suggesting that she had been killed 60 \u2013 90 minutes before her husband. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Police were initially notified around 11:15 am, but their response time was delayed, as many authorities were attending a precinct barbecue in Rocky Point, Rhode Island. Pandemonium greeted the first junior officers on scene. Curious onlookers had infiltrated the Borden residence, contaminating evidence and disrupting the delicate state of affairs. Law enforcement officials eventually managed to secure the crime scene by midafternoon. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Investigators were perplexed by the lack of obvious motive\u2014no valuables were missing from the deceased, which ruled out a \u201crobbery gone wrong.\u201d Preliminary criminal profiles suggested that a \u201cforeigner\u201d had committed this heinous atrocity\u2014ironic, considering many Fall River policemen were Irish immigrants themselves. Several suspicious characters were apprehended around town, the majority of whom were Portuguese, which accentuated local ethnic tensions; however, no official arrests were made.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n At 3 pm, Deputy Marshal John Fleet interrogated Lizzie, who confabulated strange, and at times contradictory, answers to police questioning. She originally reported hearing a \u201cgroan\u201d from inside the home around 9:30 that morning, but later recanted, stating she heard nothing. When asked about Abby\u2019s note, Lizzie recalled her stepmother burning the message, but was unable to identify the mail courier nor the obscure sick friend. Fleet pressed for an alibi. Lizzie maintained that she retreated to the barn following her conversation with Andrew; however, her rationale kept changing. At first, Lizzie was fashioning sinkers from scrap iron, then she was eating a pear in the hayloft\u2014a claim investigators deemed quite implausible, considering the barn\u2019s sweltering and stagnant heat. Policemen could hardly stand the oppressive environment for fifteen minutes, let alone thirty, and there were no obvious signs of recent occupation. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n While investigating the premises, detectives were confronted with a peculiar household layout. The home had originally been constructed as a duplex, but never remodeled following the Bordens\u2019 sole occupancy. The structure was devoid of hallways\u2014only doors connected adjacent rooms. The Borden sisters\u2019 bedrooms and second-floor guestroom could only be entered through the front stairwell, while the parents\u2019 chambers and servant\u2019s quarters were accessible via the backstairs. If Abby was killed around 9:30, the murderer would have spent nearly two hours hiding inside the house awaiting Andrew\u2019s return, at risk of being spotted by Lizzie or Bridget. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n When police searched the basement, they discovered two hatchets, two axes, and a hatchet head with a freshly-splintered handle. They also found a bucket of blood-soaked rags. Bridget, who spent considerable time laboring in the cellar, claimed she had never seen the soiled garments before. Investigators questioned Lizzie, but Dr. Bowen answered for her. He informed them of the bucket\u2019s purpose\u2014a cleansing bath for menstrual towels\u2014and sternly recommended the matter \u201cneed not be further investigated.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The Bordens\u2019 dining room functioned as a makeshift morgue during the immediate murder investigation\u2014medical examiners performed Andrew and Abby\u2019s autopsies throughout the afternoon. Because of the family\u2019s recent illness and Abby\u2019s fear of poisoning, the victims\u2019 stomach contents were examined for toxic substances; none were found. Despite the postmortem findings, police interviewed local drug stores for possible leads. Eli Bence, a pharmacist at D. R. Smith\u2019s drug store, recalled a woman inquiring about prussic acid (i.e. hydrogen cyanide) the day prior to \u201cput on the edge of seal skin coat.\u201d Bence denied the sale since the patron lacked a prescription, and the woman left amicably. That customer, Bence later claimed, was Lizzie Borden.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Despite Lizzie’s inconsistencies and questionable demeanor, law enforcement officers only performed a cursory inspection of her room, as it was considered improper to rummage through a woman’s belongings without sufficient cause. The Fall River Police Department was subsequently criticized for its lack of diligence.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The Fall River community was rocked by the butchery of Andrew and Abby Borden\u2014an audacious crime perpetrated by an unknown assailant. The public feared that a deranged killer was on the loose\u2014invading the homes of affluent families and slaying their occupants\u2014but intuitive crime scene investigators considered a different theory, one more disturbing in scope: Lizzie Borden murdered her parents. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On August 9, judiciary officials organized a formal inquest hearing to consider the homicidal events at 92 Second Street. For Massachusetts District Attorney Hosea Knowlton, the state\u2019s lead prosecutor, the proceedings were necessary to establish clarity in a convoluted case, through witness testimony and expert analysis. Upon receiving her summons, Lizzie asked for her lawyer, Andrew J. Jennings, to be present; however, the presiding Judge Josiah Blaisdell denied her request, citing the inquest\u2019s private nature.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Without proper legal counsel, Lizzie\u2019s inquest testimony degenerated into a badgering web of self-incrimination. She became increasingly flustered as her interrogation progressed, at one point exclaiming, \u201cI don\u2019t know what I have said. I have answered so many questions and I am so confused. I don\u2019t know one thing from another.\u201d Dr. Bowen came to Lizzie\u2019s defense, providing a medical explanation for her erratic behavior and spotty memory. Shortly after the gruesome double homicide, he had prescribed Lizzie morphine for sedative purposes, which could cause \u201cmental distress and nervous excitement.\u201d However, Dr. Bowen never saw Lizzie consume the medication\u2014an admission that brought her cognitive state under further scrutiny. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Investigators were convinced that Lizzie had much to gain from her parents\u2019 untimely demise\u2014a substantial inheritance and social autonomy\u2014and many police officers testified to Lizzie\u2019s unusually poised conduct and \u201clack of emotion\u201d during their initial crime scene interviews. Additional character witnesses corroborated Lizzie\u2019s bitter relationship with her stepmother, although these impressions originated in hearsay rather than first-hand accounts. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On August 11, Lizzie was arrested and charged with the murders of Andrew and Abby Borden. She pled \u201cnot guilty\u201d and was transferred to the Bristol County Jail in Taunton, Massachusetts. A preliminary hearing was held August 25 \u2013 September 1, with Judge Blaisdell overseeing the arraignment. Lizzie\u2019s defense team immediately called for Blaisdell to recuse himself since the inquest was prejudicial against their client. Unfortunately, Judge Blaisdell denied their motion and ultimately found cause for Lizzie\u2019s murder trial to proceed. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n On November 7, 1892, District Attorney Knowlton presented the case before a grand jury made up twenty-one white males. Only a simple majority was required for an indictment. For nearly four weeks, jurors listened to testimony regurgitated from the inquest hearing; however, on December 1, a previously undisclosed revelation shocked the court. Alice Russell\u2014who stayed with the Borden sisters during the homicide investigation\u2014issued a sworn statement claiming she witnessed Lizzie “burn a dark blue dress [allegedly] stained with brown paint\u201d in the kitchen stove three days after the killings. Alice\u2019s recollection was damning. On December 2, the grand jury voted 20-1 to indict Lizzie on all charges.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n While the prosecution secured a formal indictment, Knowlton recognized the legal and sociocultural hurdles his team faced in court. First, crime scene investigators possessed no hard evidence connecting Lizzie to the crime. Only a mountain of circumstantial testimony implicated her involvement. Second, Lizzie’s arrest provoked a divisive groundswell of national proportions, stressing the incongruities of class, ethnicity, and gender. Fall River elites rushed to defend Lizzie’s innocence. Women\u2019s groups, such as the WCTU and suffragettes, organized protests admonishing the hypocrisy behind her indictment\u2014Lizzie was supposed to tried by a jury of her peers, yet women were barred from serving on juries. While social groups drew on activism, affluent newspapers stood behind Lizzie\u2019s femininity. They portrayed her as a respectable woman, incapable of committing parricide due to her genteel nature and delicate sensibilities\u2014proper social conformities for upper-class Victorian females. Conversely, proletariat publications challenged the privileges Fall River’s high society enjoyed. Rumors speculated that residents on The Hill were conspiring to assure Lizzie’s acquittal, through monetary assistance and sociopolitical influence. The proclivity of Lizzie’s assumed guilt or innocence became a flashpoint for class combativeness.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The Trial of Lizzie Borden began on June 5, 1893, in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Prosecuting attorneys were Hosea Knowlton and future U.S. Supreme Court Justice William H. Moody. Lizzie’s defense team consisted of Andrew Jennings, Melvin O. Adams, and former Massachusetts Governor George Dexter Robinson. A three-judge panel presided over the proceedings: Chief Justice Albert Mason, Justice Caleb Blodgett, and Justice Justin Dewey\u2014the most controversial figure of the group. Dewey, who had been appointed to the State Supreme Court by former governor Robinson, maintained an obvious conflict of interest that Lizzie\u2019s critics found hard to ignore.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n During the presentation of prosecutorial evidence, Lizzie\u2019s defense filed a stipulation challenging the admissibility and legality of her inquest testimony\u2014it was discovered that the City Marshal Office had drafted Lizzie\u2019s arrest warrant prior to the inquest proceedings. Given the document\u2019s prejudicial nature, Robinson argued that Lizzie was essentially in police custody at the time of her statements. And since she was denied legal representation, her constitutional right to due process had been violated, thus rendering her deposition involuntary. The bench agreed and ruled Lizzie\u2019s inquest inadmissible. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Defense attorneys subsequently impugned the relevancy of Lizzie\u2019s alleged attempt to purchase prussic acid. While Robinson acknowledged the insidious properties of hydrogen cyanide, he argued that the chemical could still be used for innocent purposes. He dissected Bence\u2019s testimony and his inability to definitively identify Lizzie as the purported patron. Even if Lizzie did acquire the poison, he argued, no evidence was found during the victims\u2019 autopsies. The prosecution strongly maintained that the attempted acquisition of such a toxic substance was evidence of premeditation. Again, the judges sided with the defense, ruling that Bence\u2019s allegation was \u201ctoo remote to have any connection.\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n In the absence of key inquest testimony, the crux of Knowlton\u2019s argument centered around Lizzie\u2019s dress. While Lizzie had supposedly supplied police with the garment she wore the morning of August 4, Alice Russell\u2019s grand jury revelation contradicted such benefactive action. But Emma Borden came to her sister\u2019s defense. She eloquently explained the situation\u2014that Lizzie had walked through brown paint earlier that summer\u2014and implicated herself as the one who persuaded Lizzie to burn the dress. Emma claimed they only performed the act to preoccupy themselves during a time of crisis. Alice\u2019s version of events was simply a \u201cmisunderstanding.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie\u2019s inconsistent alibis were another point of dispute during the trial. While her father was mercilessly hacked to death, Lizzie alleged she was in the barn for nearly half an hour; but criminal investigators refuted the defendant\u2019s claim, citing the dwelling\u2019s unbearable heat and undisturbed appearance. However, the defense managed to locate several witnesses who testified that they snuck into the barn and observed the crime scene prior to police arrival. One bystander, a local ice cream man named Hyman Lubinsky, swore that he saw Lizzie exit the barn at 11:03 am. Knowlton questioned the accuracy of Lubinsky\u2019s recollection\u2014considering the only field of vision was a one-foot gap in the fence line\u2014but the eyewitness maintained his firm resolve. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n With their criminal case floundering, prosecutors called upon members of the Fall River Police to reestablish credibility. Unfortunately, many individuals, including some jurors, held nativistic tendencies against Irishmen. Lizzie\u2019s defense played into this prejudice, insinuating that Irish police exercised favoritism with Bridget\u2014the Borden\u2019s Irish maid whose alibi was almost as unbelievable as Lizzie\u2019s. Bridget was present the entire time the murders took place, yet apparently oblivious to any commotion that resonated within the residence. Police never interviewed Bridget\u2014an investigative oversight that sparked criticism concerning the department\u2019s dereliction of duty. The very fact that Irish cops were accusing an affluent, sophisticated woman of double homicide was not only insulting, but proof of their ineptitude. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie’s counsel further scrutinized crime scene forensics, arguing that whoever inflicted such carnage would have surely been covered in blood. Additionally, a woman of Lizzie’s character lacked the moral degeneracy, let alone the physical strength, to assail with such force. The prosecution’s expert witness, Dr. David Cheever, disagreed with the defense. He explained that if the victims were killed with the first whack, systemic circulation would immediately cease, yielding little blood splatter from subsequent blows, which could explain why no trace blood was found on Lizzie.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n When Dr. William Dolan\u2014the Bristol County medical examiner\u2014took the stand, Knowlton submitted Andrew and Abby Borden\u2019s fractured skulls as evidentiary exhibits for the prosecution. The gut-wrenching courtroom theatrics proved too much for poor Lizzie, who fainted at the sight of her father\u2019s emaciated remains. She was escorted out of the courthouse while Dr. Dolan demonstrated how the broken hatchet head fit perfectly into the cranial concavities. Lizzie\u2019s emotional reaction overshadowed the medical experts\u2019 testimony and reinforced her sympathy as a distraught daughter, not a heartless killer. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n During closing arguments, the prosecution reiterated Lizzie\u2019s obvious motive\u2014insatiable selfishness and greed that transformed into bloodlust\u2014unsubstantiated alibis, and destruction of potential evidence. While nothing was concrete, the mountain of circumstantial evidence presented a disturbing and undeniable conclusion\u2014Lizzie Borden was the killer. The defense responded by censuring the state\u2019s baseless criminal case and emphasizing their failure to prove wrongdoing beyond a reasonable doubt. On June 20, 1893, after scarcely ninety minutes of deliberation, the jury returned with their verdict: not guilty.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The New York Times editorialized, \u201cIt will be a certain relief to every right-minded man or woman who has followed the case to learn that the jury in New Bedford has not only acquitted Miss Lizzie Borden of the atrocious crime with which she was charged, but has done so with a promptness that was very significant.\u201d The Times continued by castigating the \u201cvanity of ignorant and untrained men\u201d in the Fall River Police Department\u2014\u201cthe usual inept and stupid and muddle-headed sort that such [smaller] towns manage to get for themselves.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Though triumphant in the legal system, Lizzie became a social pariah in the court of public opinion, where the burden of proof is nonexistent and circumstances speak volumes. She was ostracized by former defenders\u2014suffragettes, Christians, and societal elites alike\u2014wary of her probable guilt. Shortly after her acquittal, Lizzie unofficially changed her name to Lizbeth\u2014perhaps to distance herself from the trial\u2019s consequential sensationalism\u2014but her scandalous reputation was unshakable. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Because Abby died before Andrew, her net worth was absorbed by the Borden estate, which was subsequently passed to Lizzie and Emma. In September 1893, the sisters purchased their long-desired house on The Hill, dubbed \u2018Maplecroft.\u2019 The scorn of Fall River, Lizzie endured a secluded lifestyle, but found bohemian acceptance in the company of thespians. She developed a peculiar friendship with actress Nance O\u2019Neill\u2014some believe the relationship was romantic in nature\u2014much to Emma\u2019s disapproval. In 1905, the sisters became estranged. Emma moved to New Hampshire, leaving Lizzie isolated in her Maplecroft hermitage.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Lizzie Borden died of pneumonia on June 1, 1927, at the age of 66. Emma Borden succumbed to chronic nephritis nine days later. Both sisters were interred beside their slain father and stepmother at Oak Grove Cemetery. Funeral details were not published and very few mourned Lizzie\u2019s passing.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The Borden murders remain one of the most controversial and divisive events in American legal history, with Lizzie’s persona dominating contemporary pop culture narratives. The haunting legacy behind this infamous double-homicide persists at Fall River’s own Lizzie Borden House\u2014the former crime scene turned museum and bed-and-breakfast. The building hosts a variety of historic and paranormal experiences, but the most popular option is the Daytime House Tour\u2014an engaging 90-minute excursion through the entire Borden estate\u2014during which knowledgeable guides analyze circumstantial context and entertain various theories and perspectives explicating this convoluted crime. For those daring enough, book an overnight accommodation in one of the home\u2019s six historic rooms supposedly inhabited by restless Borden family spirits, including Lizzie herself. When considering its conspicuous past and macabre appeal, the Lizzie Borden House is a must-visit destination for any true crime aficionado or paranormal thrill-seeker.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_c5277e1a595a42edb97710753d7c769f~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_150,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_c5277e1a595a42edb97710753d7c769f~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_94148266776a42ce9c10666301ca6ab0~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_111,h_128,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_94148266776a42ce9c10666301ca6ab0~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_dbef880d971c41fd96d7bd19078f0b2f~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_110,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_dbef880d971c41fd96d7bd19078f0b2f~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_f85ec068c50d425b9d9deedad3a93b36~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_196,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_f85ec068c50d425b9d9deedad3a93b36~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_e0e471a670b4446386ead37c77b659a0~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_112,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_e0e471a670b4446386ead37c77b659a0~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_916001a1a82f4762ae5edf163b654391~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_168,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_916001a1a82f4762ae5edf163b654391~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_54fac215567644fda79418d15bb4a60c~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_196,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_54fac215567644fda79418d15bb4a60c~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/static.wixstatic.com\/media\/92c1b1_b5d43947055c4a4695df6645a292b57a~mv2.jpg\/v1\/fill\/w_147,h_136,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto\/92c1b1_b5d43947055c4a4695df6645a292b57a~mv2.jpg\")
<\/wow-image><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n