{"id":7067988,"date":"2026-09-27T03:54:48","date_gmt":"2026-09-27T03:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/business\/legal\/trial-court-criticized-for-its-handling-of-motion-to-suppress\/"},"modified":"2026-09-27T03:54:48","modified_gmt":"2026-09-27T03:54:48","slug":"trial-court-criticized-for-its-handling-of-motion-to-suppress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988","title":{"rendered":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

The D.C. Court of Appeals recently reversed four firearm convictions after concluding that police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant.<\/p>\n

But\u00a0Johnson v. United States<\/em><\/a>, No. 24-CF-0525 (D.C. Sept. 3, 2026), is notable for another reason.<\/p>\n

Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel in her typically understated way, Judge Catharine Easterly criticized the trial court\u2019s handling of the defendant\u2019s motion to suppress.\u00a0 Specifically, the opinion faulted D.C. Superior Court judge Erik Christian for accepting conclusory assertions about a confidential informant\u2019s reliability and for failing to make the factual findings necessary for meaningful appellate review.<\/p>\n

As Judge Easterly put it: \u201cThe court . . . must do its job.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

What led police to stop Johnson?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

MPD Officer Conner Johnson received information from another officer, Keith Cyphers, about a tip from a confidential informant.<\/p>\n

\"Washington<\/a>According to the tip, a man wearing a white shirt, black shorts and blue shoes and carrying a black bag had a firearm. Cyphers also sent Johnson a screenshot from surveillance footage.<\/p>\n

Johnson did not know the informant and had never worked with Cyphers. He knew only that Cyphers described the informant as a \u201creliable source\u201d whom he had been using \u201cfor a while.\u201d Johnson did not know what \u201cfor a while\u201d meant or why Cyphers considered the informant reliable.<\/p>\n

Police subsequently encountered Chance Cato Johnson about two blocks from the reported location. His clothing generally matched the description.<\/p>\n

Police stopped and handcuffed him. During the encounter, Johnson acknowledged that he had a gun in his bag and did not have a permit.<\/p>\n

He was subsequently convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm, carrying a pistol without a license, possession of an unregistered firearm and unlawful possession of ammunition.<\/p>\n

Judge Christian denies the motion to suppress<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Before trial, the defense moved to suppress the firearm and Johnson\u2019s statements on the ground that police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion for the stop.<\/p>\n

The government presented only Officer Johnson at the suppression hearing. Officer Cyphers \u2014 the officer who actually knew the informant and presumably knew why he considered the informant reliable \u2014 did not testify.<\/p>\n

After hearing from defense counsel, Judge Christian indicated that he believed the government had already presented sufficient evidence to justify the stop. He did so before hearing the government\u2019s argument.<\/p>\n

Judge Christian reasoned that Cyphers\u2019s knowledge concerning the informant could be imputed to Johnson and that police had corroborated the tip by finding Johnson nearby wearing clothing matching the description.<\/p>\n

After the prosecutor argued, Judge Christian simply \u201cendorse[d]\u201d the government\u2019s argument and denied the motion.<\/p>\n

That handling of the suppression motion drew pointed criticism from the Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n

Judge Christian failed to make factual findings<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Appellate courts ordinarily defer to a trial judge\u2019s factual findings on a motion to suppress.<\/p>\n

But the Court of Appeals found no such findings in this case:<\/p>\n

\u201cwe have no factual findings to which to defer because the court simply \u2018endorse[d]\u00a0[the government\u2019s]argument\u2019 at the suppression hearing\u201d<\/p>\n

The court cited Superior Court Criminal Rule 12(d), which requires a judge to state essential factual findings on the record when factual issues are involved in deciding a motion.<\/p>\n

The criticism therefore went beyond disagreement with Judge Christian\u2019s ultimate conclusion. The Court of Appeals identified a problem with the process by which he reached it.<\/p>\n

A judge must independently assess an informant\u2019s reliability<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Court of Appeals also rejected the premise underlying Judge Christian\u2019s ruling.<\/p>\n

The fact that one police officer considered an informant reliable did not establish that the informant was sufficiently reliable to justify a\u00a0Terry<\/em>\u00a0stop. The government needed to present evidence allowing the trial judge to independently evaluate that question.<\/p>\n

Courts, Judge Easterly explained, \u201cmay not simply rely on a police officer\u2019s conclusory assertions.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet the government presented virtually no evidence about the informant\u2019s reliability. It did not establish how well Cyphers knew the informant, how they communicated, or the number, frequency or accuracy of the informant\u2019s previous tips.<\/p>\n

The one officer who presumably could have supplied that information \u2014 Cyphers \u2014 did not testify.<\/p>\n

Corroborating innocent details was not enough<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Court of Appeals also found the purported corroboration insufficient.<\/p>\n

The informant\u2019s description was generic, identifying clothing and a bag but providing no information about such characteristics as height, weight, race, age or hairstyle.<\/p>\n

The surveillance screenshot did not cure the problem. At the suppression hearing, Judge Christian described the person identified as Johnson as \u201cidentical\u201d to the informant\u2019s description. But the Court of Appeals noted that another man in the same image potentially matched the description as well.<\/p>\n

More importantly, confirming innocent details such as clothing and location could not substitute for evidence establishing the informant\u2019s reliability.<\/p>\n

\u201cCorroboration of innocent details cannot substitute for an independent foundation of reliability,\u201d the court explained. \u201cIt can only supplement one.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe court . . . must do its job\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Perhaps the most striking language in\u00a0Johnson<\/em>\u00a0concerns the trial court\u2019s responsibility when reviewing police conduct.<\/p>\n

Police must assess information from confidential informants before acting on it. But when the resulting seizure is challenged, the judge must independently determine whether the government has satisfied the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe court in turn must do its job,\u201d Judge Easterly wrote.<\/p>\n

The court cannot simply accept an officer\u2019s characterization of an informant as reliable. Nor can it \u201crubber stamp a trial court ruling that is based on vague and conclusory testimony.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court of Appeals concluded that the government failed to establish reasonable articulable suspicion for the stop. Johnson\u2019s statements and the firearm should therefore have been suppressed.<\/p>\n

The court reversed all four convictions and remanded the case to D.C. Superior Court.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The D.C. Court of Appeals recently reversed four firearm convictions after concluding that police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant. But\u00a0Johnson v. United States, No. 24-CF-0525 (D.C. Sept. 3, 2026), is notable for another reason. Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel in her typically understated way, Judge Catharine Easterly criticized the trial court\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7067989,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97],"tags":[410,65195,22079,16623,55782,13623],"dealstore":[],"offerexpiration":[],"class_list":["post-7067988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal","tag-court","tag-criticized","tag-handling","tag-motion","tag-suppress","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"\nTrial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The D.C. Court of Appeals recently reversed four firearm convictions after concluding that police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant. But\u00a0Johnson v. United States, No. 24-CF-0525 (D.C. Sept. 3, 2026), is notable for another reason. Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel in her typically understated way, Judge Catharine Easterly criticized the trial court\u2019s […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\"},\"headline\":\"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\"},\"wordCount\":958,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Court\",\"Criticized\",\"Handling\",\"Motion\",\"Suppress\",\"Trial\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Legal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\",\"name\":\"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":300},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"description\":\"Daily Deals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":86,\"caption\":\"Som2ny Network\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network","og_description":"The D.C. Court of Appeals recently reversed four firearm convictions after concluding that police lacked reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant. But\u00a0Johnson v. United States, No. 24-CF-0525 (D.C. Sept. 3, 2026), is notable for another reason. Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel in her typically understated way, Judge Catharine Easterly criticized the trial court\u2019s […]","og_url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988","og_site_name":"Som2ny Network","article_published_time":"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":200,"height":300,"url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371"},"headline":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress","datePublished":"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988"},"wordCount":958,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg","keywords":["Court","Criticized","Handling","Motion","Suppress","Trial"],"articleSection":["Legal"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988","name":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress - Som2ny Network","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg","datePublished":"2026-09-27T03:54:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Washington-capitol-vertical-200x300.jpg","width":200,"height":300},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7067988#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trial court criticized for its handling of motion to suppress"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","name":"Som2ny Network","description":"Daily Deals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization","name":"Som2ny Network","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","width":300,"height":86,"caption":"Som2ny Network"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/fivemor.com"],"url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7067988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7067988"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7067988\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7067989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7067988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7067988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7067988"},{"taxonomy":"dealstore","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fdealstore&post=7067988"},{"taxonomy":"offerexpiration","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fofferexpiration&post=7067988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}