\n<\/p>\n
\u2013 Raghuvansh Bhutani<\/em><\/strong>*<\/p>\n Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n With the exponential rise in demand for mineral resources driven by global economic expansion and technological advancement, seabed mining has emerged as a strategic imperative for nations like India.\u00a0India aims to improve its economic growth and tech progress, and seabed mining stands out as an important area, offering essential resources like rare earth elements and minerals needed for industries such as electronics and renewable energy. India\u2019s location by the Indian Ocean along with a potential oceanic coverage of 3.274 million sq. km<\/a>. provides it with the opportunity to utilise its extensive maritime resources. India\u2019s proposal to International Seabed Authority (ISA) to explore the area<\/a> allotted to it for Deep sea Mining with India\u2019s launching of the Deep Ocean Mission and the development of the Matsya 6000<\/a> indicates a policy inclination within India to engage in extracting resources from the seabed sooner rather than later.<\/p>\n However, the impact deep sea mining on marine environment is a hotly debated topic with a significant portion of the international maritime community advocating for a\u00a0precautionary pause on global deep sea mining<\/a>\u00a0in light of its potential to cause\u00a0significant and irreversible detriment to marine ecosystems. India\u2019s current legal framework for deep sea mining remains substantially underdeveloped and is inadequately equipped to address the contemporary challenges of deep sea mining operations, especially in light of the stringent obligations under international maritime law to implement appropriate preventive environmental protection measures.<\/p>\n This article analysis the present Indian legal framework on deep sea mining and advocates why a precautionary principle should be adopted in consonance with the obligations under international law and how it can be incorporated in the Indian legal framework to tackle the contemporary environmental challenges while balancing the economic growth of the country.<\/p>\n Impact of Deep-Sea mining on environment<\/strong><\/p>\n Deep sea mining has the potential to significantly affect marine ecosystems<\/a> in a number of manners, hence raising significant contemporary environmental issues about biodiversity and damage to habitats. The potential environmental impact of deep sea mining is largely speculative and may possibly be disastrous. Maritime areas of commercial interest are often quite\u00a0highly biodiverse<\/a>, and many of the species in these particular regions, might possibly face\u00a0extinction<\/a>\u00a0due to deep sea mining. The pollution generated may trigger a\u00a0variety of symptoms<\/a>\u00a0that may be detrimental to various species.<\/p>\n Along with the destruction of this habitat, the mining operations may also generate pollution, which can travel for\u00a0several kilometres from the various mining sites and has the potential to affect international fisheries\u00a0<\/a>by threatening species crucial for to the industry. Moreover, there can be further impact of these mining operations as they can potentially have long term repercussions for Marine environments<\/a>.<\/p>\n Obligations under international law<\/strong><\/p>\n United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)<\/a> \u00a0constitutes the primary legal architecture\u00a0mandating precautionary environmental protection in marine activities, including deep sea mining.\u00a0Article 192\u00a0establishes the general obligation that\u00a0States have the obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment. Moreover, Article 193 and 194 of UNCLOS enumerate that the sovereign right of States to exploit their natural resources needs to be in accordance with their duty and the general obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment.\u00a0<\/p>\n The\u00a0International Seabed Authority (ISA)<\/strong> regulatory framework\u00a0explicitly incorporates the precautionary approach as a\u00a0binding legal requirement. The\u00a0ISA Nodules Regulations 31(2)\u00a0and\u00a0Sulphides and Crusts Regulations 33(2)\u00a0<\/a>mandate that\u00a0sponsoring States and the Authority shall apply a precautionary approach. This particular approach is a codification of Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration, which essentially requires that \u201cwhere there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0This obligation is applicable to the ISA, the sponsoring State and any contractor sponsored by the state.<\/p>\n The\u00a0landmark Moreover, there has been a growing international consensus regarding the inclusion of a precautionary approach in deep sea mining operations, with European Union<\/a> and Furthermore, precautionary principle has been recognised in India through various judicial decisions like Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India and Ors<\/em>.<\/a>,<\/em> where it was held to be an integral aspect of Indian jurisprudence on environmental protection. However, there has been an inconsistent application of the principle in India<\/a> and moreover, there has been a lack of precedent and discourse regarding the principle\u2019s application to deep sea mining operations.<\/p>\n Therefore, integration of this principle in Indian deep sea mining framework would be in pursuance of the duties enumerated under UNCLOS.<\/p>\n Present Indian Deep sea mining framework<\/strong><\/p>\n At the international level, UNCLOS has established the foundational framework for regulation of deep sea mining operations while delineating the various state responsibilities while promoting sustainable extraction methodologies. However, a comprehensive examination reveals that India\u2019s domestic regulatory framework remains substantially underdeveloped, and requires urgent evaluation to ensure the alignment of it with international standards.<\/p>\n The\u00a0Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 \u00a0(OAMDR)\u00a0serves as India\u2019s primary legislation governing deep sea mining operations. While the International Seabed Authority explicitly recognises<\/a> this Act as India\u2019s national legislation on deep sea mining, the statute suffers from fundamental inadequacies in addressing the unique environmental challenges posed by deep sea mining operations. The Act provides environmental safeguards yet its provisions remain insufficient for the preventive environmental protection mandated by contemporary international law.<\/p>\n Section 20 of the OAMDR act is its principal environmental provision, which merely requires operators to conduct activities subject to all the applicable laws and rules for the prevention and control of pollution and protection of marine environment. This generic formulation represents a reactive approach which fails to incorporate the proactive environmental protection standards essential for deep sea mining governance. The provision\u2019s reliance on the phrase \u201cany other law\u201d creates regulatory uncertainty, as existing environmental legislations were formulated before the development of deep sea mining technologies and therefore, lacks sector-specific protections.<\/p>\n Moreover, the Act demonstrates\u00a0further significant deficiencies in preventive environmental measure as, unlike comprehensive environmental statutes that mandate rigorous ex-ante assessments, the OAMDR act contains no explicit requirements for\u00a0Environmental Impact Assessments specifically tailored to deep sea ecosystems. Even the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 applies only up to territorial waters (12 nautical miles), leaving deep sea mining operations beyond this limit without mandatory environmental clearance procedures. The Expert Appraisal Committee processes under EIA frameworks provide standardised Terms of Reference, however they do not consider the unique characteristics of deep sea environments, which creates inappropriate assessment methodologies for marine ecosystems. Moreover, while\u00a0Section 19A\u00a0places a general duty on the Central Government to safeguard the offshore environment, this obligation lacks the specificity and enforceability mechanisms necessary for effective environmental governance. This can be further exemplified by the legislation\u2019s licensing framework which operates through discretionary governmental authority without concrete statutory criteria for environmental protection.<\/p>\n Furthermore, Section 21\u00a0empowers the Central Government and administering authority to issue directions for environmental protection, yet the absence of published rules and notifications under the Act leaves this discretionary power without operational guidelines. The government has yet to promulgate comprehensive regulations under the Act, creating an enforcement vacuum for environmental protection measures.<\/p>\n How to incorporate Precautionary principle in Indian legal framework<\/strong><\/p>\n The systematic incorporation of the precautionary principle within India\u2019s legal architecture for deep sea mining necessitates a comprehensive two-pronged approach that addresses both the\u00a0statutory foundation\u00a0and\u00a0operational implementation\u00a0of precautionary obligations. This dual methodology ensures that precautionary governance transcends mere procedural formality to become an enforceable legal imperative with substantive environmental protection outcomes.<\/p>\n Firstly,<\/em> By an explicit and comprehensive inclusion in the text of the Indian legal framework on Deep sea mining as a potential general principle clause, the precautionary principle should be statutorily embedded to transform it from a judicial construct into a clear legislative mandate. The present OAMDR contains environmental safeguards but lacks the explicit precautionary principle language necessary for effective implementation.<\/p>\n Moreover, legislative precedent already exists within India\u2019s environmental jurisprudence with the\u00a0National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.<\/a> Section 20 of the NGT Act mandates\u00a0that the tribunal shall apply the precautionary principle when deciding environmental disputes. Therefore, it is a legislative exercise that should be undertaken to incorporate definitive language for inclusion of precautionary principle that aligns with Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration while creating enforceable domestic obligations that mirror international standards.<\/p>\n Secondly,<\/em> By establishing comprehensive ex-ante obligations on contractors and governmental authorities before authorizing any deep sea mining operations. For this, ISA\u2019s draft exploitation regulations<\/a> alongside the existing regulations and guidelines for exploration of seabed Minerals<\/a> may serve as an exemplary blueprint for incorporation of the principle in the present Indian deep sea mining framework.<\/p>\n Comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and environmental management and monitoring plans can be introduced with the condition to demonstrate how state and its agents would manage uncertainties and adapt their operations in the event of unexpected impacts.<\/p>\n Another operational inclusion can be the development of Regional Environmental Management Plans (REMPs) that identifying zones that must be protected from mining (APEIs). for example, The ISA has provided an environmental management plan for the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ)<\/a>, and identifies a network of 13 areas of particular environmental interest that are entirely protected from deep-seabed mining. In total, the network of APEIs in CCZ represents 1.97 million km2<\/sup>\u00a0of protected seabed. Similarly, India can also integrate similar means to designate areas of environmental interest such as fishing zones, breeding grounds and coral reefs, and protect these environmentally sensitive areas from deep sea mining operations.<\/p>\n