\n
![](\"https:\/\/progressive.org\/downloads\/23194\/download\/ColbertProtest.jpg?cb=b989b2a83ed0b94583c19311738ec5c4\")
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p>\n
The Trump 2.0 era has intensified a deeply entrenched pathology in the American media system: concentrated corporate ownership. During less perilous times, legitimate concerns about a few corporations capturing so much of our news and information have often been dismissed as conspiracy theories and paranoia. But Donald Trump and his coterie of plutocrats have made our\u00a0media oligarchy problem<\/a>\u00a0acutely evident and impossible to ignore.<\/p>\n Constant controversies\u2014from government and corporate censorship of television comedians like Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert to the algorithmic and editorial abuses of Elon Musk\u2019s X and Jeff Bezos\u2019s\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>\u2014remind us why media ownership holds such high stakes for any semblance of democracy. Meanwhile, rightwing nepotistic dynasties like the Murdochs and the Ellisons hold inordinate influence over what millions of people can see, hear, and read in their daily media.<\/p>\n Our current media system is simply incompatible with democracy, making structural media reform an urgent priority. This includes unwinding previously approved and pending mergers\u2014exhibit A being\u00a0Paramount Skydance\u2019s potential acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery<\/a>\u00a0(which owns CNN and HBO, among other key holdings)\u2014as well as trust-busting corporate media behemoths by forcing them to divest major components of their sprawling conglomerates.<\/p>\n Undoing the wreckage will take time, but we must lay the groundwork now to launch necessary structural reforms the moment we dethrone Trump and his ilk. This project requires a clear analytical framework for understanding exactly why such run-amok media concentration is bad for democracy, and why breaking up media conglomerates is both necessary and insufficient for reconstructing the media we need from the ground up.<\/p>\n Big corporate media mergers are bad for everyone other than those few who stand to profit. They\u2019re harmful for media workers, consumers, local communities, First Amendment freedoms, and democracy writ large. Over the years, the dangers for democracy posed by media concentration have been borne out by empirical evidence. Research\u00a0shows<\/a>\u00a0that media conglomeration can lead to less local news,\u00a0more advertising<\/a>, and shifts toward conservative political commentary, especially under the ownership of rightwing companies such as Sinclair.<\/p>\n According to\u00a0basic democratic theory<\/a>, ensuring diverse voices, viewpoints, and stories in our media requires a pluralistic range of media owners. However, the hypercommercialized, corporate-dominated U.S. media system wasn\u2019t devised to privilege democracy. In fact, given its weak public media system, oligopolistic media markets, and light public interest regulations\u2014many of which eroded over time or simply were ignored (or\u00a0weaponized<\/a>\u00a0under Trump)\u2014the U.S. media system is almost perfectly designed to\u00a0not<\/em>\u00a0serve democracy.<\/p>\n Within this hypercommercialized media structure, despite many individual journalists\u2019 courageous work to the contrary, profit imperatives too often trump democracy (bad pun intended). Capitalist logics undercut and skew democratic discourse by encouraging clickbait, excluding low-income communities, and degrading the quality of journalism. Capitalist incentive structures also lead to pronounced deficits through sheer cost cutting, and by treating news and information as commodities, not public services, and audiences as passive consumers, not engaged citizens.<\/p>\n Even during the best of times, media corporations often maximize profits by ruthlessly cutting corners and forcing their media workers to do more for less. Too often, costly services like high-quality journalism are dismantled while content that\u2019s cheaply produced and easily replicated\u2014like shouting heads across ubiquitous screens, endlessly capturing our attention for advertisers\u2014gets amplified.<\/p>\n Media conglomeration only intensifies these commercial logics. For example, cost cutting typically accelerates immediately following big mergers when companies take on tremendous debt. New corporate ownership has subjected CBS to such restructuring and would likely do the same to CNN if the pending merger goes through, for which Paramount Skydance is reportedly\u00a0incurring<\/a>\u00a0$79 billion in debt. To compensate, media corporations often combine newsrooms and lay off reporters\u2014or eliminate journalism altogether in favor of opinion and commentary.<\/p>\n In addition to decimating jobs, managing such debt tends to result in outsourcing costs to audiences by raising prices, offering lower-quality programming, and providing less creative cultural fare. This outcome is especially detrimental given a media landscape already riddled with\u00a0news deserts<\/a>, in which scarce original journalism and local media content are being produced.<\/p>\n The debasement of our news and entertainment media is bad enough. But media conglomeration also creates private tyrannies wherein oligarchs command broad swaths of our media. Driven by perverse incentives, these media barons wield dangerous control over public discourse, warping how important issues get framed and what stories get told.<\/p>\n Conferring such political economic power onto a small elite is itself a severe democratic threat. Whether through lobbying, campaign contributions, or preferential press coverage of politicians in exchange for regulatory favors, these media oligarchs almost always develop corrupt relationships with those in government, undercutting the press\u2019s much-vaunted \u201cwatchdog function\u201d of holding the powerful to account.<\/p>\n Moreover, media consolidation is a structural precondition for authoritarianism. We saw such patterns play out under Hungary\u2019s former Prime Minister Viktor Orb\u00e1n, who\u00a0demonstrated<\/a>\u00a0how authoritarians needn\u2019t control newsrooms by gunpoint. Rather, they can rely on chummy oligarchs to discipline the media for them, resulting in news feeds and media channels saturated with government-approved talking points and propagandistic narratives that brook little dissent toward those in power.<\/p>\n It shouldn\u2019t surprise us that billionaires are likely to deploy their media assets to advance their class interests. This is especially prevalent in the United States, given devalued media properties and extreme concentrations of wealth. To provide one stark example: Jeff Bezos bought\u00a0The\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0in 2013 for\u00a0less than half<\/a>\u00a0of what he would later pay for his super yacht.<\/p>\n In the final analysis, such concentrated corporate ownership\u2014whereby a tiny elite commands so much power over our media\u2014is antithetical to democratic society. Even if today\u2019s villainous oligarchs had the hearts of angels, it\u2019s far too much power for any individual to wield over our news media. Just as every billionaire is a policy failure, every billionaire-owned media outlet is a profound threat to our democracy.<\/p>\n How did the United States fall under this media oligarchy? Many of our contemporary media failures trace back to\u00a0specific policies and political decisions<\/a>. One such inflection point occurred\u00a0during the 1930s<\/a>\u00a0and 1940s, when policymakers established a privatized and highly commercialized broadcast media system tempered by relatively\u00a0weak public interest protections<\/a>. The latter included what became known as the\u00a0Fairness Doctrine<\/a>, which President Ronald Reagan\u2019s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) jettisoned in 1987.<\/p>\n The United States belatedly\u00a0established<\/a>\u00a0a\u00a0chronically underfunded<\/a>\u00a0public broadcasting system in the late 1960s. But after a period of modest progressive policymaking, we began rolling back media ownership restrictions and \u201cderegulating\u201d our media in the 1980s, leading up to the infamous\u00a0Telecommunications Act of 1996<\/a>, when media consolidation began to escalate. In many ways, our oligopolistic media landscape has only worsened since the merger mania of the Clinton-Bush neoliberal heyday.<\/p>\n Particularly alarming is the utter\u00a0collapse of local journalism<\/a>, in which more than\u00a040 percent<\/a>\u00a0of our newspapers and\u00a0three-quarters of our local journalists<\/a>\u00a0have vanished since the early 2000s. Meanwhile, FCC Chair Brendan Carr is a loyal\u00a0apparatchik<\/a>\u00a0for bullying what\u2019s left of our independent media into capitulation to Trump.<\/p>\n Combined with the federal\u00a0defunding<\/a>\u00a0of our public media, few structural alternatives and countervailing forces can withstand a blasted media landscape dominated by profit imperatives and a handful of media moguls. What\u2019s to be done?<\/p>\n Today we face a dangerous new terrain upon which an authoritarian government weaponizes a hypercommercialized corporate media system against democracy. Yet, the market libertarianism and policy failures over the decades that enabled media oligarchy weren\u2019t inevitable or natural, nor must they be permanent. These were political choices, and politics are subject to human agency and change. But first we must denaturalize this hypercapitalistic system that turns our media against democracy.<\/p>\n To begin, we must recognize that our media pathologies run even deeper than bad billionaire media owners doing bad things. Ownership structures are only part of the problem\u2014a key part, to be sure\u2014downstream from the core root of our\u00a0media polycrisis<\/a>: capitalism. Confronting media monopolies requires us to reckon with the underlying conditions that made such concentration possible, specifically the hypercapitalist logics capturing our information and communication infrastructures from root to branch.<\/p>\n Indeed, our media\u2019s systemic problems predate the recent spate of mergers under Trump. While today we must\u00a0stop mega media mergers<\/a>, tomorrow we must create an entirely\u00a0new public media ecosystem<\/a>\u00a0in service to local communities. To combat the capitalist capture of the entire American media apparatus that produces various kinds of \u201cmarket censorship\u201d that would-be autocrats like Trump can exploit, we must create a\u00a0non-capitalistic system<\/a>\u2014a truly public and independent media system\u2014that\u2019s owned and controlled by us all.<\/p>\n Fortunately,\u00a0recent positive signs<\/a>\u00a0have already emerged at the state and local levels, ranging from contesting media mergers by\u00a0state attorneys general<\/a>\u00a0to making\u00a0public investments<\/a>\u00a0toward local journalism. Yet we must broaden our political imagination and plan for bold national policy interventions for the post-Trump moment. There\u2019s a strong practical need to be utopian right now\u2014to give us hope but to also provide clarity as to what we should be fighting for. We need a long-term vision firmly planted on our political horizons\u2014we\u00a0can<\/em>\u00a0dare to imagine a media system that privileges democracy over power and profit.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Trump 2.0 era has intensified a deeply entrenched pathology in the American media system: concentrated corporate ownership. During less perilous times, legitimate concerns about a few corporations capturing so much of our news and information have often been dismissed as conspiracy theories and paranoia. But Donald Trump and his coterie of plutocrats have made […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7058404,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12022],"tags":[190309,7732,1180,50481,2083,10999,25326,220635],"dealstore":[],"offerexpiration":[],"class_list":["post-7058403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-activist","tag-august-september-2026","tag-democracy","tag-fight","tag-further-comment","tag-magazine","tag-media","tag-oligarchy","tag-victor-pickard"],"yoast_head":"\n