{"id":7050045,"date":"2026-08-28T14:32:37","date_gmt":"2026-08-28T14:32:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/angel-investor\/the-stupid-reasons-startups-run-out-of-money-and-die-pitching-angels\/"},"modified":"2026-08-28T14:32:37","modified_gmt":"2026-08-28T14:32:37","slug":"the-stupid-reasons-startups-run-out-of-money-and-die-pitching-angels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7050045","title":{"rendered":"The Stupid Reasons Startups Run out of Money and Die \u2013 Pitching Angels"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

Running out of cash is a result, not a cause, of most startup failures<\/h3>\n

Yet another startup that I invested in closed its doors last week, citing \u201cran out of cash\u201d as the reason for their failure, blaming investors for not supporting the company.<\/p>\n

They had customers. Quite a few, in fact. They had growth, but not hypergrowth. Though they started as an IoT business, they now presented themselves as an AI solution for enterprise logistics.<\/p>\n

And yet, they ran out of money.<\/p>\n

Their goal, like every other venture-backed startup, was to get to $100M, and get acquired for a billion or two to make the founders and investors rich. Or at least reach $25M for a modest exit that gets founders decent compensation for their time while investors get their money back.<\/p>\n

They ran out of money long before reaching those goals.<\/p>\n

Of course, they were operating at a loss. Just like every other startup. It takes a lot of fuel to reach orbit.<\/p>\n

They built a business for scale, invested in development, hired AI specialists, built a hardware supply chain. To get to the required $100M run rate, they hired sales people and sales managers, business development specialists, and channel sales teams. They had more salespeople than customers.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s how a startup works. They lose money for years until sales growth overtakes the fixed expenses. In the meantime, investors pay the bills. Until they stop. And then the company runs out of money and dies.<\/p>\n

Running out of money is a symptom, not a cause. If the company is doing well, there\u2019s plenty of fresh investor cash to be had. If the company is struggling, investors flee. Saying a startup ran out of money doesn\u2019t tell us anything useful. The real question is why did investors turn off the money taps?<\/p>\n

Here the 5 main reasons why investors stop investing:<\/p>\n

Not Reaching Hypergrowth<\/h3>\n

The model for venture capital is the startup will reach $100M in revenue within 5\u20137 years and get acquired for a $1B. That\u2019s the plan. Venture funds need to return cash to their investors in that time frame, leaving a short timeline to reach critical mass and get acquired.<\/p>\n

Getting from $100K in Year 1 to $100M in Year 5 means increasing revenues 30% every month. If you\u2019re not growing close to 4x year over year, you\u2019re not going to reach orbit.<\/p>\n

If you grew 25% this year compared to last, for most companies that would be a great achievement. For a venture startup, that\u2019s failure. There\u2019s no way to reach $100M within the venture timeframes growing at 25%. Or even doubling each year.<\/p>\n

At first, the VCs will push you to re-examine everything: your product, your market, your sales strategy. They\u2019ll tell you to hire more sales people and spend more on marketing to accelerate growth. Then they\u2019ll tell you to replace the underperforming head of sales. Then they\u2019ll tell you to find a new CEO.<\/p>\n

And if those changes don\u2019t get the company to 10x growth, they\u2019re not going to invest in the next round. Sorry. Their first check was nothing but an admission fee to get an inside seat. They expect to lose it. Cost of doing business. The bigger later checks, the real money, are reserved for the few companies in their portfolio that are on target for orbit.<\/p>\n

Market Opportunity Smaller Than Expected<\/h3>\n

Remember that TAM\/SAM\/SOM? When you pitched to investors, you convinced them you were solving an important problem for a huge market that would make it easy to reach $100M in sales. But how big is that opportunity, really?<\/p>\n

It\u2019s hard to tell until you\u2019re knee-deep in the selling. And not just pilots and sales to the desperate few. It\u2019s not until you start trying to sell to the prospects who haven\u2019t heard of you and may not even know they have a problem that you find out how big (or not) the market really is.<\/p>\n

It often happens that the SOM is a lot smaller than projected. Maybe the benefits aren\u2019t big enough for most users to overcome corporate inertia, take a risk on something new, and rip off the bandage of changing operating processes. Maybe there are technical reasons why the product is only suitable for a sub-segment of the market. Maybe there are more competitors, or more entrenched competition than you thought.<\/p>\n

Once it becomes clear that the SOM is actually $500M instead of $5B, investors will be a whole lot less excited about doubling down on their investment in the next round. It might still be a nice business, but if it no longer looks like a venture business with 100x returns, that earlier investment becomes a sunk cost and the worst thing an investor can do is invest in the next round. Bye.<\/p>\n

Missing Milestones<\/h3>\n

You promised to reach $2M in sales last year. Instead, you only hit $1M. You said you\u2019d have v2 released by April. Now it\u2019s looking like November. You said you\u2019d sign up 5 new customers last quarter. Instead, you only signed 2, with the others pushed out for a quarter.<\/p>\n

At a regular company, these results might be disappointing, but not the end of the world. Contracts get delayed. Customers change priorities. Employees leave. Tariffs, supply chain snaggles, and wars screw up even the best laid plans. You roll with what you\u2019ve got.<\/p>\n

But when you\u2019re operating at a loss and you need the next round of funding to pay the bills, and that funding is dependent on meeting the milestones that you promised would be unlocked by the last round, well\u2026the continued existence of the business is tenuous, at best.<\/p>\n

To get funding, in the last round you promised to meet optimistic, probably impossible, milestones with the money. You have no room for error. If customers are slower to sign up than you anticipated (they always are) and development takes twice as long as you expected (it always does), you\u2019ve set yourself up for failure.<\/p>\n

Loss of Confidence<\/h3>\n

Let\u2019s be honest \u2014 investors don\u2019t spend a lot of time in diligence. A few meetings, a few phone calls, then they write a check. They really don\u2019t know what\u2019s going on inside the company. They don\u2019t know if the founding team is actually competent or just talk a good game.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why venture funds write a small check first. It\u2019s an entry ticket. They get a couple of years watching the company from the inside. On the board, or at least as board observer. And then they know.<\/p>\n

First question new investors in each round ask is whether the current investors are re-investing in the new round. If the answer is no, that\u2019s the end of the conversation.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019ve failed to be honest; if you\u2019ve hidden important information; if you\u2019ve treated employees poorly; if you\u2019ve had fights with the board; or if it becomes clear you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re doing, you\u2019ll lose confidence of the current investors. And if that happens, you won\u2019t have new investors.<\/p>\n

Bad Planning<\/h3>\n

This is the stupidest reason for a company to fail, and yet I see it happen again and again. Poor financial planning.<\/p>\n

How much cash to you have in the bank? How much are you spending? How long will that last? How long will it take to get more?<\/p>\n

These are simple questions. Obvious questions. Critical questions. Too many founders ignore them. They think the accountants are taking care of the money. They\u2019re not. They just doing the accounting of the money. It\u2019s up to the CEO to manage it. And make sure there\u2019s enough to make payroll.<\/p>\n

That means looking at the financial reports daily. Watching the bank account. Obsessing over cash flows. Because you will run out. The only question is when. And can you fill up before then.<\/p>\n

If you think you can raise new funding in 60 days, you\u2019re deluded. A round typically takes 6 months to close, often 9 months, sometimes longer. If you have less than 9 months cash in the bank, you better get started now. Because nobody wants to invest in a company that\u2019s out of cash and looks desperate.<\/p>\n

How to Succeed<\/h3>\n

Want to succeed? Do the following:<\/p>\n