{"id":7034324,"date":"2026-08-08T23:38:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-08T23:38:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/uncategorized\/bitcoin-losses-and-seed-flaw-explained\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T23:38:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T23:38:09","slug":"bitcoin-losses-and-seed-flaw-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7034324","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Losses and Seed Flaw Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

In the latest Bitcoin news today, Analytical estimates from Galaxy Research, cited by analytics account Lookonchain, indicate that total losses tied to the Coldcard hack have reached approximately 2,055 Bitcoin (BTC), worth $130 million, across more than 7,700 victim addresses.<\/p>\n

The estimate follows reports of multiple suspected on-chain sweep waves linked to a seed-generation flaw in devices made by Canadian firm Coinkite.
\n
\n
\n\n<\/p>\n

The flaw affected how seeds were generated on vulnerable firmware, allowing attackers to derive and test candidate keys offline when they could determine or sufficiently constrain relevant device information.<\/p>\n

EXPLORE:\u00a0Best Meme Coins to Buy for August<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Bitcoin News Today: Coldcard Firmware Flaw and Weak Randomness<\/h2>\n

March 2021 firmware integration error routed seed generation to a deterministic software pseudorandom number generator (PRNG) rather than the STM32 hardware random number generator (RNG).<\/p>\n

The production configuration defined the hardware-RNG macro as zero, while the underlying libngu library checked whether the macro existed rather than whether it was enabled, binding the build to MicroPython\u2019s Yasmarang fallback.<\/p>\n

The MicroPython fallback was initialized from chip unique identifiers and timer registers and did not collect fresh entropy after initialization. Block said an attacker able to determine or sufficiently constrain the device UID, timer state and prior RNG-call history could reproduce candidate output streams offline, then derive addresses and compare them with public blockchain data.<\/p>\n

\n

\ud83d\udea8URGENT COLDCARD SECURITY UPDATE<\/p>\n

Read carefully before acting.<\/p>\n

\ud83d\udc49Mk3 seed generated on 4.0.1+ without \u226550 private, independent dice rolls: begin a careful migration now.<\/p>\n

\ud83d\udc49Mk4\/Mk5 https:\/\/t.co\/HshUxevCl3 https:\/\/t.co\/zrkUuACRyE<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 COLDCARD (@COLDCARDwallet) July 31, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Coinkite estimated effective entropy for affected seeds at roughly 40 bits on Mk3 hardware and about 72 bits on Mk4, Mk5 and Q models, compared with 128 bits for a 12-word BIP-39 seed. The practical cost of reproducing seeds depends on available UID information, boot timing, prior RNG calls and derivation cost, according to Block.<\/p>\n

The incident highlights the importance of seed-generation security and auditing critical flaws in open-source repositories<\/a> used by cryptographic hardware. Coinkite shipped emergency firmware for affected models and release tracks on July 31, but installing updated firmware does not repair an existing weak seed. The company advises owners with exposed seeds to generate a new seed on patched firmware and move their coins; restoring the old seed carries the weakness forward.<\/p>\n

DISCOVER:\u00a0Best Meme Coins to Buy in 2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

On-Chain Analysis of Suspected Sweep Waves<\/h2>\n

Detailed on-chain analysis of the Coldcard PRNG vulnerability<\/a> identified an initial July 30 sweep that drained 1,082.65 BTC from 1,196 addresses in 41 minutes. That opening wave averaged close to one BTC per address.<\/p>\n

\n

This is insane!<\/p>\n

According to @glxyresearch<\/a>, the total losses from the #Coldcard<\/a> hack may have reached 2,055 $BTC<\/a>($130M).<\/p>\n

More than 7,700 victim addresses have been affected. pic.twitter.com\/GizWlDbYpz<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Lookonchain (@lookonchain) August 4, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Subsequent tracking documented by CoinDesk reporting<\/a> identified a third suspected wave that drained roughly 208 BTC from 1,912 addresses, or just over one-tenth of a BTC per victim.<\/p>\n

In that later wave, transactions batched an average of six victims per sweep, sent each victim\u2019s coins to a separate destination and used pay-to-witness-script-hash (P2WSH) outputs rather than the plain single-key outputs used in earlier waves.<\/p>\n

Galaxy Research said it was confident that each wave was internally the work of one operator, but cautioned that on-chain data could not determine whether the same attacker was responsible for all three waves.<\/p>\n

The firm also said it had not computationally confirmed that every identified address was generated with weak Coldcard entropy. Galaxy reported roughly 600 suspected attacker-controlled addresses to federal investigators, compliance firms and cybersecurity investigators.<\/p>\n

next<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Disclaimer: <\/span>Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWeb3 News<\/a>, Bitcoin News<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n\t\t\t \"Daniel
\n\t\t\t <\/figure>\n
\n

Daniel Frances is a technical writer and Web3 educator specializing in macroeconomics and DeFi mechanics. A crypto native since 2017, Daniel leverages his background in on-chain analytics to author evidence-based reports and deep-dive guides. He holds certifications from The Blockchain Council, and is dedicated to providing “information gain” that cuts through market hype to find real-world blockchain utility.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n


\n <\/p><\/div>\n