{"id":7032688,"date":"2026-08-07T22:47:21","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T22:47:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/uncategorized\/berkeley-laws-ai-policy-what-it-means-for-ai-in-legal-education\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T22:47:21","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T22:47:21","slug":"berkeley-laws-ai-policy-what-it-means-for-ai-in-legal-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688","title":{"rendered":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"c-reading-time\"><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i class=\"icon-clock\"\/> 12 minutes read<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"c-published-date\"><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i class=\"icon-calendar\"\/><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tUpdated Jun 3, 2026<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"c-post__summary\">\n<p class=\"c-post__summary-text\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tBerkeley Law just published what might be the most restrictive student AI policy in legal education. The rule, effective Summer 2026, prohibits AI use for almost every part of a student&#8217;s substantive work, from brainstorming to outlining to exam prep, with limited carve-outs for professor opt-in and basic research. The policy gets some things right, including a clear default rule and the responsibility it places on students for citation accuracy. But it overreaches in places, contradicts recent empirical research on how AI affects legal reasoning, and includes a research carve-out that permits the exact kind of AI use most likely to produce errors.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"c-post__intro h5\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Berkeley Law just published the most restrictive student AI policy we\u2019ve seen in legal education. The new <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.berkeley.edu\/academics\/registrar\/academic-rules\/artificial-intelligence-policy\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">rule from UC Berkeley School of Law<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> goes into effect this summer, and it\u2019s already caused a stir on social media and in the press. It also raises the questions every law school is now considering: How do you teach AI to students who already use it? How do you preserve the doctrinal training that makes great lawyers? And how do you grade a class where some students are AI-augmented, and some aren\u2019t?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There has been plenty of online criticism about the policy, though it seems like some of it is based on a headline or a cursory reading. Regardless of the LinkedIn hot takes, the policy in full deserves a closer look, because most other law schools face the same dilemma.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"o-image l-image c-post--mobile-thumbnail \" style=\"max-width: 46.875rem;  \">\n<div class=\"o-image__wrap l-image__wrap js-lazy-image-wrapper\" style=\"padding-top:53.8461538462%;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<noscript><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"First Year Lawyer Salaries\" alt=\"First Year Lawyer Salaries\" src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Practice-During-Bar-Exam-Uncertainty-750x404.png\" width=\"750\" height=\"404\"\/><br \/>\n\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t\t<picture>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" title=\"First Year Lawyer Salaries\" alt=\"First Year Lawyer Salaries\" width=\"750\" height=\"404\" loading=\"lazy\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Practice-During-Bar-Exam-Uncertainty-750x404.png\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" class=\"is-lazy js-lazy-image\"\/>\n\t\t<\/picture>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h2 id=\"section-0\"><b>What Berkeley Law\u2019s AI policy prohibits, and what it allows<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Berkeley didn\u2019t ban AI. As a matter of policy, it made the use of AI prohibited as a default rule for almost every part of a student\u2019s substantive work. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Here\u2019s the rule itself: <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe use of AI is prohibited for aid in conceptualizing, outlining, drafting, revising, translating, or editing any work submitted for credit. AI use is prohibited for any use for any purpose in any exam situation. Students may not upload course materials\u2014including assignments, readings, slides, class recordings, or other class content\u2014into generative AI systems. AI can be used for research on papers ONLY for the limited purpose of identifying sources, such as cases, statutes, or secondary sources. Students are responsible for the accuracy of their research and all other aspects of their submitted work. Citations to sources that do not exist will raise a presumption of prohibited AI use.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The categories of prohibited use listed in the policy include brainstorming, organizational structure, summarizing, identifying repetitive passages, revising or polishing a paper, generating an exam outline, and asking AI to translate a paper originally written in another language.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"AI in Legal Education: Did Berkeley Law Go Too Far with Its New AI Policy?\" width=\"840\" height=\"473\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/jziAMVevto4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is not a blanket ban, and law professors may include AI in the curriculum if they choose. And even where they don\u2019t, students retain a narrow allowance for research.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instructors can deviate from the default rule in writing, with appropriate notice, and can require students to disclose any authorized AI use. So professors who want to teach AI as part of their courses can opt in.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The student research exception is narrower. AI can be used for research on papers \u201conly for the limited purpose of identifying sources, such as cases, statutes, or secondary sources.\u201d Students remain responsible for the accuracy of the research and all other aspects of their submitted work. And citations to sources that do not exist will raise a presumption of prohibited AI use.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-1\"><b>What the policy gets right<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A few things are worth defending in Berkeley\u2019s policy, even if you don\u2019t agree with where it draws the line.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>It\u2019s a clear rule.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Law schools across the country have been wrestling with what to tell students about AI use, and most of them haven\u2019t said much. This leaves students wondering whether or under what circumstances AI use is permitted, and whether other students are secretly juicing their work with artificial intelligence. Berkeley has made the default explicit. That clarity is itself a service to students, even if some students would prefer a different default.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>It puts responsibility for citation accuracy on the student.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The policy says students are responsible for everything they cite, and that citations to nonexistent sources will be presumed to be AI-generated. That\u2019s a good norm to build into law students. The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/blog\/ai-hallucinations-in-law\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AI hallucination problem in court filings<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> is real enough that it\u2019s worth teaching at the law school level.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>It requires disclosure.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Where AI use is authorized, students have to disclose it. That\u2019s a good, instructive policy, and the direction law schools should be heading.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>It\u2019s a floor, not a ceiling.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Professors who want to teach AI can opt in. Berkeley isn\u2019t pretending that AI doesn\u2019t exist; it\u2019s setting a strict default and pushing the affirmative decision to use AI down to the course level. That\u2019s a structural choice that some professors will appreciate, especially those who already restrict laptops, Wi-Fi, or exam software to preserve specific pedagogical experiences.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-2\"><b>Where the policy goes too far<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The policy is also too broad in places, in ways that work against its own goals.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Enforcement is the most obvious issue. <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The rule against jaywalking in New York City was a fine rule that got broken constantly with no real consequences. Berkeley\u2019s policy faces the same problem. Any student who decides to be a \u201csecret cyborg,\u201d to use AI quietly and never disclose it, is going to be hard to catch. The detection tools are unreliable, and the most sophisticated AI use leaves no trace. A blanket prohibition that can\u2019t be enforced creates a two-tier system: students who follow the rules and students who don\u2019t, and the rule-followers may end up at a disadvantage.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The chilling effect on curiosity is the bigger issue.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Berkeley\u2019s list of prohibited uses includes brainstorming, summarizing, and identifying repetitive passages. These are exactly the kinds of low-stakes uses that help students explore unfamiliar material, find their way into a topic, and build intuition. A student who would otherwise ask Claude or ChatGPT to summarize a hard case before reading it, or to brainstorm angles on a paper topic, will now think twice. Some of those uses might have helped them learn faster. Some of them might have surfaced ideas they wouldn\u2019t have found on their own.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There\u2019s a serendipity argument here too. Law librarians talk about the value of perusing the stacks and finding books you didn\u2019t know existed. AI is a different kind of serendipity engine. Ask it about a doctrine and it might point you to a concept or a case you\u2019d never have encountered. Cutting off that mode of discovery for first-year students assumes that we know exactly how learning happens, and we don\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-3\"><b>Research on AI and legal reasoning cuts the other way<\/b><\/h2>\n<div class=\"o-image l-image aligncenter size-full wp-image-56952 \" style=\"max-width: 46.875rem;  width: 1920px;\">\n<div class=\"o-image__wrap l-image__wrap js-lazy-image-wrapper\" style=\"padding-top:56.25%;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<noscript><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Blog Illustration \u2013 Solo and Small Firm AI\" alt=\"How Solo &amp; Small Firms Save Time With AI Without a Tech Overhaul\" src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-750x422.png\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\"\/><br \/>\n\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t\t<picture><source srcset=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-750x422.webp 1x, https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-1500x844.webp 2x\" type=\"image\/webp\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Blog Illustration \u2013 Solo and Small Firm AI\" alt=\"How Solo &amp; Small Firms Save Time With AI Without a Tech Overhaul\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-750x422.png\" class=\"is-lazy js-lazy-image\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-750x422.png 1x, https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Blog-Illustration-Solo-and-Small-Firm-AI-1500x844.png 2x\"\/>\n\t\t<\/picture>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Recent research makes that point empirically rather than philosophically. Professor Dan Schwarcz at the University of Minnesota recently ran <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6525800\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a study with collaborators at the University of Michigan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> testing the hypothesis that AI hurts legal reasoning. Two groups of law students were given cases, statutes, and regulations. Group one had less AI access; group two had more. Both groups went through four stages of work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The hypothesis going in was that the AI-assisted group would do the early work faster but worse at the harder analytical work, and that once the AI was taken away, the no-AI group would outperform the AI group because they\u2019d built the mental models themselves.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That\u2019s not what happened.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Stage one<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (synthesizing cases, statutes, and regulations): The AI group did the work faster and better, as expected.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Stage two<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (multiple-choice questions about the law, with AI removed from the AI group): The two groups did equally well. The AI group didn\u2019t lose any ground from having used the tool.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Stage three<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (applying client facts to the law, again with AI removed from the AI group): The AI group actually did <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">better<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> than the no-AI group. The researchers\u2019 hypothesis was wrong in the opposite direction.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Stage four<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (both groups given AI): The AI had mixed results, helping weak writers but hurting strong writers.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Worth noting: The AI tended to raise the floor for weaker writers more than it raised the ceiling for stronger writers. Some already-strong writers actually got worse results when they used AI, because they appeared to accept lower-quality output than they would have produced on their own. But the overall finding is striking: AI use during early stages of learning the law appears to <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">strengthen<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> legal reasoning, even after the AI is removed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The hypothesis on why is interesting. Getting the \u201cCliffsNotes\u201d version right away, without going down rabbit holes of misunderstanding, may help students build a better mental model of the doctrine in the first place. Rather than replacing thinking, AI might accelerate the foundation that makes deeper thinking possible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This study is an empirical study, and the researchers\u2019 starting hypothesis turned out to be wrong. That\u2019s harder to dismiss than a thought experiment. It also cuts directly against Berkeley Law\u2019s policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-4\"><b>The legal research carve-out is backwards<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One specific piece of the policy deserves its own scrutiny. That\u2019s the policy\u2019s carve-out for using AI in legal research.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Berkeley\u2019s policy says AI can be used \u201cfor the limited purpose of identifying sources, such as cases, statutes, or secondary sources.\u201d This is the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">one<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> thing that generative AI foundation models are worst at. ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini hallucinate cases more than any other category of legal output. The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.damiencharlotin.com\/hallucinations\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1,400+ documented cases worldwide of AI-generated errors<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> making it into court filings are overwhelmingly bad case citations, not bad brainstorming.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The carve-out doesn\u2019t distinguish between general-purpose chatbots and purpose-built legal AI tools with hyperlinked citations to real authority. A student could comply with the policy by using ChatGPT to \u201cidentify sources\u201d for a paper, and walk straight into a citation to a case that doesn\u2019t exist. A different student, using a legal AI tool grounded in real case law, would get verifiable citations every time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If UC Berkeley had drawn a line between general-purpose chatbots and verified legal AI, the carve-out would make sense. Instead, the policy permits exactly the kind of AI use most likely to produce errors and prohibits the kinds of use (brainstorming, summarizing) where errors are lowest-stakes.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-5\"><b>Beyond Berkeley Law\u2019s AI policy: How should law schools teach AI?<\/b><\/h2>\n<div class=\"o-image l-image aligncenter size-full wp-image-48442 \" style=\"max-width: 46.875rem;  width: 1920px;\">\n<div class=\"o-image__wrap l-image__wrap js-lazy-image-wrapper\" style=\"padding-top:56.25%;\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<noscript><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Blog \u2013 Student Document Automation\" alt=\"Students prepare for future by using document automation in class\" src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-750x422.png\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\"\/><br \/>\n\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t\t<picture><source srcset=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-750x422.webp 1x, https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-1500x844.webp 2x\" type=\"image\/webp\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Blog \u2013 Student Document Automation\" alt=\"Students prepare for future by using document automation in class\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-750x422.png\" class=\"is-lazy js-lazy-image\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-750x422.png 1x, https:\/\/www.clio.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Blog-Student-Document-Automation-1500x844.png 2x\"\/>\n\t\t<\/picture>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policies like Berkeley\u2019s are answers to a question most law schools haven\u2019t been asked to articulate out loud yet. What\u2019s the right approach to AI in legal education, and how should law schools train lawyers to use AI well?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The calculator analogy is useful here. Math students learn arithmetic before they\u2019re given calculators, so that when they later use calculators, they can recognize when an output is wrong. The discipline of mathematics expanded in the calculator era. The same is true of accounting and spreadsheets. The power tools didn\u2019t replace the thinking. Instead, they raised the ceiling on what was possible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The same logic probably applies to AI in law. The best AI users in legal practice tend to be lawyers with strong doctrinal foundations. They recognize when an output is missing an exception, when the analysis lacks depth, when the tool cites only one case but misses the seminal case. They treat AI output as a first draft. That critical judgment is what law schools are trying to teach, and judgment is hard to build if students are either (a) never exposed to AI or (b) using AI as a substitute for the underlying analysis.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The open question is how long the doctrinal training needs to last before students are turned loose with AI. Some professors will argue to ban AI for all three years. Some will argue a single semester. The most favorable policy is probably in the middle, with significant variation by subject area and by students\u2019 planned post-graduation work.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There\u2019s also a deeper change happening in the work itself. Many of the tasks that junior associates used to do\u2014research, first drafts, due diligence, document review\u2014are increasingly being done by machines. Those tasks were how associates built the tacit doctrinal expertise that makes great lawyers. If the tasks go away, the training opportunities go with them. Law schools are choosing more than whether to allow AI. They\u2019re choosing how to develop tacit expertise when the traditional pipeline is changing underneath them.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-6\"><b>Why this is really an assessment problem<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Strip away the AI debate, and Berkeley\u2019s policy is really about something else entirely: how to grade students fairly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Law schools across the country, like all of higher education, are wrestling with how to fairly assess students in a world where some are using AI and some aren\u2019t. How do you grade a paper written manually with grammatical errors against a paper polished by Gen AI with no errors? How do you cold-call a class when half the students might be typing the question into ChatGPT and reading back the answer in real time? How do you give a take-home exam that some students are completing themselves and others are completing with significant AI assistance?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Many law schools are getting rid of papers. Others are moving back to handwritten exams. Some are abandoning take-home assignments entirely. The assessment infrastructure that supported a half-century of legal education is being rebuilt in a two-year period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s a little like the recent enhanced games in athletics, where some athletes openly used performance-enhancing drugs and competed against others who didn\u2019t. Some of the unenhanced athletes still won. But the comparison highlights how hard fair assessment becomes when participants have radically different toolkits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Berkeley\u2019s policy is, in part, an attempt to solve that assessment problem by removing the variable. If AI use is uniformly prohibited, the assessment can be uniform too. That\u2019s an understandable goal, even if the means are debatable.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"section-7\"><b>What UC Berkeley Law\u2019s AI policy means for law schools<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Berkeley Law\u2019s AI policy isn\u2019t the final word on any of this. It\u2019s an early move from a renowned law school, and it deserves to be evaluated for what it is rather than dismissed as a refusal to engage with AI in legal education. A few things to take away from it.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Clarity is a virtue.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A clear default rule, paired with an opt-in mechanism for instructors who want to teach AI, is more useful than the ambiguous silence at many other law schools.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Citation responsibility is the right norm.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Holding students responsible for the accuracy of every cited source, with a presumption that fake citations are AI-generated, is going to be standard practice in the profession. Teaching it now is the right call.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>The empirical evidence complicates the case.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The Schwarcz study suggests that AI use during early-stage learning may strengthen legal reasoning, not weaken it. Future policies should account for that.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>The legal research carve-out is backwards.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> General-purpose chatbots are the worst at the exact task Berkeley permits. A better-drawn policy would distinguish between foundation models and purpose-built legal AI tools with hyperlinked, verifiable sources.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>The real question is assessment.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Behind every law school AI policy is a deeper question about how to fairly evaluate students in a world where some are AI-augmented and some aren\u2019t. Berkeley\u2019s policy is one answer. There will be many others.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The competitive picture in legal AI keeps shifting, and law school policies are going to keep shifting with it. Berkeley made an early, strong move. It may or may not look right in five years. What\u2019s certain is that the assessment problem and the tacit-expertise problem aren\u2019t going away, and the schools that figure out how to teach AI literacy and rigorous doctrinal thinking at the same time are going to produce the lawyers who do best in the profession that\u2019s emerging.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Used well, AI raises the ceiling on what law students can learn. Used carelessly, AI short-circuits the very expertise that makes lawyers most able to supervise AI use effectively in practice. The work ahead for AI in legal education is to strike the right balance, advancing traditional doctrinal coursework, assessing students fairly, and preparing them to practice in a changed profession.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"c-post--blog-subscription\">\n<section class=\"o-theme--bone u-padding-top-xl u-padding-bottom-xl\">\n<div class=\"o-form--marketo l-form--marketo js-marketo-form l-form-blog-sub-shortcode l-form-blog-sub-shortcode--light \" data-form-id=\"2634\" data-form-ids=\"\" data-is-kiosk-mode=\"\" data-is-multi-step-form=\"\" data-is-debug-mode=\"\" data-cookie=\"\" data-next-form-id=\"\" data-zoom-info-form-complete=\"\" data-followup-url=\"\" data-followup-url-target=\"\" data-followup-cta=\"\" data-thank-you-message=\"You're on the list! Our posts will now come straight to your inbox.\" data-submit-button-text=\"\">\n<div class=\"o-form__wrap l-form__wrap is-just-form\">\n<p>Loading &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><h2 class=\"o-form__title\">Subscribe to the blog<\/h2>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>12 minutes read Updated Jun 3, 2026 Berkeley Law just published what might be the most restrictive student AI policy in legal education. The rule, effective Summer 2026, prohibits AI use for almost every part of a student&#8217;s substantive work, from brainstorming to outlining to exam prep, with limited carve-outs for professor opt-in and basic [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7032689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[191140],"tags":[16807,7415,13300,6036,7519,11572],"dealstore":[],"offerexpiration":[],"class_list":["post-7032688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-practice-of-law","tag-berkeley","tag-education","tag-laws","tag-legal","tag-means","tag-policy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"12 minutes read Updated Jun 3, 2026 Berkeley Law just published what might be the most restrictive student AI policy in legal education. The rule, effective Summer 2026, prohibits AI use for almost every part of a student&#8217;s substantive work, from brainstorming to outlining to exam prep, with limited carve-outs for professor opt-in and basic [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1040\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\"},\"headline\":\"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\"},\"wordCount\":2751,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Berkeley\",\"Education\",\"Laws\",\"Legal\",\"Means\",\"Policy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Practice of Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\",\"name\":\"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png\",\"width\":1040,\"height\":560},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"description\":\"Daily Deals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":86,\"caption\":\"Som2ny Network\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network","og_description":"12 minutes read Updated Jun 3, 2026 Berkeley Law just published what might be the most restrictive student AI policy in legal education. The rule, effective Summer 2026, prohibits AI use for almost every part of a student&#8217;s substantive work, from brainstorming to outlining to exam prep, with limited carve-outs for professor opt-in and basic [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688","og_site_name":"Som2ny Network","article_published_time":"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1040,"height":560,"url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371"},"headline":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education","datePublished":"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688"},"wordCount":2751,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png","keywords":["Berkeley","Education","Laws","Legal","Means","Policy"],"articleSection":["Practice of Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688","name":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education - Som2ny Network","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png","datePublished":"2026-08-07T22:47:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Graphic_Blog_Marketing_Clio_2020_Approved-for-Distribution_How-Law-Schools-Can-Help-Young-Lawyers-Pr.png","width":1040,"height":560},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=7032688#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Berkeley Law\u2019s AI Policy: What It Means for AI in Legal Education"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","name":"Som2ny Network","description":"Daily Deals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization","name":"Som2ny Network","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","width":300,"height":86,"caption":"Som2ny Network"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/fivemor.com"],"url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7032688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7032688"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7032688\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7032689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7032688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7032688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7032688"},{"taxonomy":"dealstore","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fdealstore&post=7032688"},{"taxonomy":"offerexpiration","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fofferexpiration&post=7032688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}