Comparison posts are one of the most valuable content formats you can publish on an affiliate site. They\u2019re also one of my favorites to write, because the reader is exactly where you want them \u2014 already shopping, already narrowed down, just looking for help picking between two specific options.<\/p>\n
The affiliate who writes the most genuinely useful comparison \u2014 the one that actually helps the reader decide \u2014 earns the click. Doing that takes real craft.<\/p>\n
This article is the full walkthrough on writing every layer of a comparison post \u2014 from the first sentence of the intro all the way through to the tracking you set up to let the data decide the real winner.\u00a0<\/p>\n
By the end, you should have a complete framework you can apply to every comparison post you write going forward \u2014 and a structure that makes sure every one of them converts.<\/p>\n
The Blueprint of an Affiliate Product Comparison Article\u00a0<\/h2>\nEvery comparison post should hit these sections, roughly <\/em>in this order:<\/p>\n\n- Introduction<\/strong> \u2014 the exact products being compared<\/li>\n
- Comparison table<\/strong> \u2014 fast scannable overview of both products<\/li>\n
- Head-to-head sections<\/strong> \u2014 feature-by-feature, category-by-category breakdown<\/li>\n
- Verdict<\/strong> \u2014 your final, honest recommendation<\/li>\n
- Affiliate link placements<\/strong> \u2014 where you actually drive clicks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
You can shift things around, add sections, or trim ones that don\u2019t apply to your products. But these five components are the load-bearing parts of the post. If any of them are missing or weak, the whole thing leaks conversion opportunities.<\/p>\n
The rest of this guide covers how to write each one well.<\/p>\n
Writing the Introduction <\/strong><\/h2>\nThe introduction is your only opportunity to keep the reader on the page<\/a>. They\u2019ve already clicked from search results, which means they trust you enough to give your post a chance \u2014 but only a chance.<\/em><\/p>\nMost readers decide within the first 10 to 15 seconds whether to keep reading or hit the back button and find a different post. Your intro has to earn their attention immediately.<\/p>\n
The 3 jobs of a comparison post intro<\/h3>\n\n- Confirm to the reader they\u2019re in the right place.<\/strong> The first sentence should mention both products by name, even better if they\u2019re in the same order the reader searched for them<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Frame the decision they\u2019re trying to make.<\/strong> Why do people compare these two specific products? What\u2019s the underlying question they\u2019re trying to answer? The pain point they\u2019re trying to solve? Naming those questions explicitly tells the reader you understand them<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Tell them what they\u2019ll walk away with.<\/strong> The intro should preview the structure briefly \u2014 that you\u2019ll be looking at features, pricing, ease of use, and ultimately giving a recommendation. Readers stay on posts where they can see the path through.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Get those three things right, and you\u2019ve earned the rest of the post.<\/p>\n
Building the Comparison Table <\/strong><\/h2>\nThe comparison table is the most important visual element in your entire post. It\u2019s the first thing scanners look at and often the only thing some readers will engage with before bouncing or clicking.<\/p>\n
A good comparison table should be able to carry the post on its own; meaning readers who just came to skim<\/a> should still walk away with a clear answer from the table alone.<\/p>\nChoosing Rows that Actually Compare<\/strong><\/h3>\nIt\u2019s tempting to include every feature both products offer in your comparison table \u2014 but that approach almost always backfires.<\/p>\n
A 20-row table is overwhelming and makes the reader\u2019s eyes glaze over before they reach the rows that would actually help them decide.<\/p>\n
The most useful tables are short, focused, and built around differences. If both products offer the same thing in a given row, that row isn\u2019t doing comparison work. It\u2019s just filler.<\/p>\n
Rows worth including in most comparison tables:<\/p>\n
\n- Pricing<\/strong> \u2014 either lists the entry-level price or price range<\/li>\n
- Best use case or ideal user<\/strong> \u2014 a one-line summary of who each product is for<\/li>\n
- Standout feature<\/strong> \u2014 the single feature each product is best known for<\/li>\n
- Specific differentiators<\/strong> \u2014 features one product offers that the other does not<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Aim for six to nine rows total. If your table starts running longer than that, go through and cut anything that isn\u2019t genuinely helping the reader differentiate between the two products.<\/p>\n
Whether to Declare a Winner in the Table<\/h3>\nSome affiliates go ahead and add a \u201cwinner\u201d tag somewhere on their comparison table \u2014 a small visual badge on which product wins overall. Others save the verdict for the end of the post.<\/p>\n![\"Comparison](\"https:\/\/thirstyaffiliates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/product-comparrion-table-example-1024x725.png\" "\\"product")
<\/figure>\nMy take: a single \u201cwinner\u201d cell in the table can work if you want to give scanners the takeaway up front. But declaring a winner before you\u2019ve shown your reasoning can feel premature, and it gives the reader no incentive to read the rest of the post.<\/p>\n
A middle-ground approach is to label individual rows with which product wins each category. That gives the reader directional information without flattening the entire comparison into a single verdict before they\u2019ve earned context for it.<\/p>\n
Writing the Head-to-Head Sections<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe head-to-head sections are where the bulk of your writing happens. They\u2019re also where you build the case for your final recommendation, one category at a time.<\/p>\n
Choosing Your Comparison Categories<\/h3>\nDeciding on the categories you\u2019ll be comparing<\/a> is one of the most important strategic decisions you\u2019ll make in the entire post, because it determines what the reader actually walks away thinking about.<\/p>\nA good comparison post uses 3-5 categories. Fewer than three feels thin. More than five gets exhausting and dilutes each individual section. The categories you pick should be the ones your reader actually cares about\u00a0<\/p>\n
The good news is, you\u2019ve already done most of this thinking when you built your comparison table. The categories your table is highlighting are usually the same ones worth dedicating a head-to-head section to.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Depending on the products \u2013 or especially services<\/a> \u2013\u00a0 you might consider adding additional categories such as integrations, scalability, mobile experience, or specific industry use cases.<\/p>\nThe Structure of a Single Head-to-Head Section<\/h3>\nInside each head-to-head section, the structure should be consistent across the post. I write every head-to-head section in this order:<\/p>\n
\n- A one-sentence framing<\/strong> of what this category is and why it matters for the buying decision<\/li>\n
- What Product A offers<\/strong> in this category \u2014 specific, concrete details<\/li>\n
- What Product B offers<\/strong> in this category \u2014 specific, concrete details<\/li>\n
- A direct comparison<\/strong> of how they stack up against each other<\/li>\n
- A winner call<\/strong> \u2014 which one wins this category, and why<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
That kind of repeating structure goes against my instincts for almost every other type of writing, and probably yours too. Comparison posts are the exception.\u00a0<\/p>\n
It\u2019s genuinely best practice for this format \u2014 readers learn the rhythm by the second section and can scan the rest of the post effectively from there.<\/p>\n
It also forces you to write an actual analysis in step 4, instead of just describing each product separately and assuming the reader will compare them in their head. They won\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Writing the Verdict <\/strong><\/h2>\nThe verdict is the most consequential section in your entire post. Everything before it has been buildup.<\/p>\n
The reader has scrolled, scanned the table, read the head-to-head sections, and now they\u2019re here for the answer.\u00a0<\/p>\n
What you say in the verdict determines whether they click your affiliate link<\/a> or close the tab and go look for another article that gives them a clearer answer.<\/p>\nDon\u2019t Hedge<\/h3>\nThe biggest temptation in writing a verdict is to \u201chedge\u201d \u2014 to soften your recommendation and say something like \u201cboth are great products and it really depends on your needs.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\nThat kind of verdict feels safer to write. You can\u2019t be wrong if you don\u2019t say anything. But it doesn\u2019t help the reader, and worse, it actually pushes them away from your post.<\/p>\n
They didn\u2019t come to your post for permission to make either choice. They came to your post for a recommendation. An answer. <\/p>\n
A hedged verdict tells them that even after reading 2,000 words of your analysis, you\u2019re still not willing to pick a side. So they go look for a different post that actually takes a position.<\/p>\n
A clear verdict, even one that other people might disagree with, is what readers actually want. <\/p>\n
The \u201cWho Should Pick Which\u201d framing<\/h3>\nThe most useful verdict pattern for comparison posts is what I call the \u201cwho should pick which\u201d framing.<\/p>\n
Instead of declaring a single overall winner and leaving readers whose situation calls for the other option feeling unseen, you split your recommendation by use case.<\/p>\n
Something like:<\/p>\n
\u201cFor most dog owners looking to support their pup\u2019s joint health day-to-day, Product A is the better pick \u2014 it\u2019s a daily chewable, more affordable per dose, and easy to find at most major pet retailers. But if you\u2019re caring for a senior dog with serious mobility issues or a breed prone to joint problems, Product B\u2019s higher-potency formula and vet-backed ingredient list are worth the extra cost.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\nThis framing does 3 things at once:<\/p>\n
\n- It takes a clear position (Product A wins for most readers)<\/li>\n
- It earns back the readers whose situation favors the other option<\/li>\n
- It builds your credibility as someone who actually understands the products<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Almost every comparison post I write uses some version of this framing for the verdict. It\u2019s the most reader-respecting way to make a recommendation, and it converts better<\/a> than any other verdict structure I\u2019ve tried.<\/p>\nPlacing Your Affiliate Links and CTAs<\/strong><\/h2>\nA comparison post that gets the click structure wrong wastes the work that came before it. Your CTAs are the layer that determines whether all that writing actually earns commission.<\/p>\n
Where CTAs Should Go throughout the Post<\/h3>\nPlace CTAs at multiple points in the post, not just at the end. A reader who\u2019s already decided by the time they reach the comparison table shouldn\u2019t have to scroll to the bottom to find a link.<\/p>\n
Here are typically the most influential places in your content to drop a CTA:<\/p>\n
\n- In the comparison table itself<\/strong> \u2014 usually as a button or text link in a \u201cTry It\u201d or \u201cVisit Site\u201d row at the bottom of each product column<\/li>\n
- At the top of each head-to-head section<\/strong> \u2014 paired with a product display (if you\u2019re using one)<\/li>\n
- In the verdict section<\/strong> \u2014 direct CTAs for whichever product you\u2019re recommending, with a secondary CTA for the alternative<\/li>\n
- In a final summary CTA<\/strong> \u2014 at the very end of the post, often as a side-by-side button block<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
![\"Product](\"https:\/\/thirstyaffiliates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/AAWP-product-display-table-example.png\" "\\"AAWP")
Example of an AAWP product comparison table with built in Buy on Amazon buttons placed directly inside the comparison table for each product Source<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThat\u2019s typically four to six CTAs throughout the post, which sounds like a lot but doesn\u2019t feel pushy when the placements are natural and the copy is varied.<\/p>\n
Buttons vs. Text Links vs. Product Displays<\/h3>\nYou actually have three CTA formats to work with in a comparison post, and each one has a different role.<\/p>\n
\n- Buttons<\/strong> stand out and drive higher click-through rates, but using them everywhere makes the post feel like a sales page. Use them in the comparison table, in the verdict section, and at the final summary CTA \u2014 moments where you want maximum visual emphasis on the click.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Text links<\/a><\/strong> blend into the content and feel more natural, but they\u2019re easier to scroll past. Use them inside the head-to-head sections, where buttons would interrupt the flow of the analysis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- ThirstyAffiliates Product Displays<\/a><\/strong> are visual product cards that combine an image, key specs, pricing, and a CTA button into one branded block. They\u2019re the strongest fit for anchoring the top of each head-to-head section, where you\u2019re introducing a specific product before getting into the analysis.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
![\"Banner](\"https:\/\/thirstyaffiliates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/0169c45f-cd06-4fb3-b117-25a9338494f9-1024x496.png\" "\\"0169c45f-cd06-4fb3-b117-25a9338494f9")
<\/figure>\n
- \n
- Introduction<\/strong> \u2014 the exact products being compared<\/li>\n
- Comparison table<\/strong> \u2014 fast scannable overview of both products<\/li>\n
- Head-to-head sections<\/strong> \u2014 feature-by-feature, category-by-category breakdown<\/li>\n
- Verdict<\/strong> \u2014 your final, honest recommendation<\/li>\n
- Affiliate link placements<\/strong> \u2014 where you actually drive clicks<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
You can shift things around, add sections, or trim ones that don\u2019t apply to your products. But these five components are the load-bearing parts of the post. If any of them are missing or weak, the whole thing leaks conversion opportunities.<\/p>\n
The rest of this guide covers how to write each one well.<\/p>\n
Writing the Introduction <\/strong><\/h2>\n
The introduction is your only opportunity to keep the reader on the page<\/a>. They\u2019ve already clicked from search results, which means they trust you enough to give your post a chance \u2014 but only a chance.<\/em><\/p>\n
Most readers decide within the first 10 to 15 seconds whether to keep reading or hit the back button and find a different post. Your intro has to earn their attention immediately.<\/p>\n
The 3 jobs of a comparison post intro<\/h3>\n
- \n
- Confirm to the reader they\u2019re in the right place.<\/strong> The first sentence should mention both products by name, even better if they\u2019re in the same order the reader searched for them<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Frame the decision they\u2019re trying to make.<\/strong> Why do people compare these two specific products? What\u2019s the underlying question they\u2019re trying to answer? The pain point they\u2019re trying to solve? Naming those questions explicitly tells the reader you understand them<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Tell them what they\u2019ll walk away with.<\/strong> The intro should preview the structure briefly \u2014 that you\u2019ll be looking at features, pricing, ease of use, and ultimately giving a recommendation. Readers stay on posts where they can see the path through.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Get those three things right, and you\u2019ve earned the rest of the post.<\/p>\n
Building the Comparison Table <\/strong><\/h2>\n
The comparison table is the most important visual element in your entire post. It\u2019s the first thing scanners look at and often the only thing some readers will engage with before bouncing or clicking.<\/p>\n
A good comparison table should be able to carry the post on its own; meaning readers who just came to skim<\/a> should still walk away with a clear answer from the table alone.<\/p>\n
Choosing Rows that Actually Compare<\/strong><\/h3>\n
It\u2019s tempting to include every feature both products offer in your comparison table \u2014 but that approach almost always backfires.<\/p>\n
A 20-row table is overwhelming and makes the reader\u2019s eyes glaze over before they reach the rows that would actually help them decide.<\/p>\n
The most useful tables are short, focused, and built around differences. If both products offer the same thing in a given row, that row isn\u2019t doing comparison work. It\u2019s just filler.<\/p>\n
Rows worth including in most comparison tables:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Pricing<\/strong> \u2014 either lists the entry-level price or price range<\/li>\n
- Best use case or ideal user<\/strong> \u2014 a one-line summary of who each product is for<\/li>\n
- Standout feature<\/strong> \u2014 the single feature each product is best known for<\/li>\n
- Specific differentiators<\/strong> \u2014 features one product offers that the other does not<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Aim for six to nine rows total. If your table starts running longer than that, go through and cut anything that isn\u2019t genuinely helping the reader differentiate between the two products.<\/p>\n
Whether to Declare a Winner in the Table<\/h3>\n
Some affiliates go ahead and add a \u201cwinner\u201d tag somewhere on their comparison table \u2014 a small visual badge on which product wins overall. Others save the verdict for the end of the post.<\/p>\n
<\/figure>\nMy take: a single \u201cwinner\u201d cell in the table can work if you want to give scanners the takeaway up front. But declaring a winner before you\u2019ve shown your reasoning can feel premature, and it gives the reader no incentive to read the rest of the post.<\/p>\n
A middle-ground approach is to label individual rows with which product wins each category. That gives the reader directional information without flattening the entire comparison into a single verdict before they\u2019ve earned context for it.<\/p>\n
Writing the Head-to-Head Sections<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The head-to-head sections are where the bulk of your writing happens. They\u2019re also where you build the case for your final recommendation, one category at a time.<\/p>\n
Choosing Your Comparison Categories<\/h3>\n
Deciding on the categories you\u2019ll be comparing<\/a> is one of the most important strategic decisions you\u2019ll make in the entire post, because it determines what the reader actually walks away thinking about.<\/p>\n
A good comparison post uses 3-5 categories. Fewer than three feels thin. More than five gets exhausting and dilutes each individual section. The categories you pick should be the ones your reader actually cares about\u00a0<\/p>\n
The good news is, you\u2019ve already done most of this thinking when you built your comparison table. The categories your table is highlighting are usually the same ones worth dedicating a head-to-head section to.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Depending on the products \u2013 or especially services<\/a> \u2013\u00a0 you might consider adding additional categories such as integrations, scalability, mobile experience, or specific industry use cases.<\/p>\n
The Structure of a Single Head-to-Head Section<\/h3>\n
Inside each head-to-head section, the structure should be consistent across the post. I write every head-to-head section in this order:<\/p>\n
- \n
- A one-sentence framing<\/strong> of what this category is and why it matters for the buying decision<\/li>\n
- What Product A offers<\/strong> in this category \u2014 specific, concrete details<\/li>\n
- What Product B offers<\/strong> in this category \u2014 specific, concrete details<\/li>\n
- A direct comparison<\/strong> of how they stack up against each other<\/li>\n
- A winner call<\/strong> \u2014 which one wins this category, and why<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
That kind of repeating structure goes against my instincts for almost every other type of writing, and probably yours too. Comparison posts are the exception.\u00a0<\/p>\n
It\u2019s genuinely best practice for this format \u2014 readers learn the rhythm by the second section and can scan the rest of the post effectively from there.<\/p>\n
It also forces you to write an actual analysis in step 4, instead of just describing each product separately and assuming the reader will compare them in their head. They won\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Writing the Verdict <\/strong><\/h2>\n
The verdict is the most consequential section in your entire post. Everything before it has been buildup.<\/p>\n
The reader has scrolled, scanned the table, read the head-to-head sections, and now they\u2019re here for the answer.\u00a0<\/p>\n
What you say in the verdict determines whether they click your affiliate link<\/a> or close the tab and go look for another article that gives them a clearer answer.<\/p>\n
Don\u2019t Hedge<\/h3>\n
The biggest temptation in writing a verdict is to \u201chedge\u201d \u2014 to soften your recommendation and say something like \u201cboth are great products and it really depends on your needs.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n
That kind of verdict feels safer to write. You can\u2019t be wrong if you don\u2019t say anything. But it doesn\u2019t help the reader, and worse, it actually pushes them away from your post.<\/p>\n
They didn\u2019t come to your post for permission to make either choice. They came to your post for a recommendation. An answer. <\/p>\n
A hedged verdict tells them that even after reading 2,000 words of your analysis, you\u2019re still not willing to pick a side. So they go look for a different post that actually takes a position.<\/p>\n
A clear verdict, even one that other people might disagree with, is what readers actually want. <\/p>\n
The \u201cWho Should Pick Which\u201d framing<\/h3>\n
The most useful verdict pattern for comparison posts is what I call the \u201cwho should pick which\u201d framing.<\/p>\n
Instead of declaring a single overall winner and leaving readers whose situation calls for the other option feeling unseen, you split your recommendation by use case.<\/p>\n
Something like:<\/p>\n
\u201cFor most dog owners looking to support their pup\u2019s joint health day-to-day, Product A is the better pick \u2014 it\u2019s a daily chewable, more affordable per dose, and easy to find at most major pet retailers. But if you\u2019re caring for a senior dog with serious mobility issues or a breed prone to joint problems, Product B\u2019s higher-potency formula and vet-backed ingredient list are worth the extra cost.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n
This framing does 3 things at once:<\/p>\n
- \n
- It takes a clear position (Product A wins for most readers)<\/li>\n
- It earns back the readers whose situation favors the other option<\/li>\n
- It builds your credibility as someone who actually understands the products<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Almost every comparison post I write uses some version of this framing for the verdict. It\u2019s the most reader-respecting way to make a recommendation, and it converts better<\/a> than any other verdict structure I\u2019ve tried.<\/p>\n
Placing Your Affiliate Links and CTAs<\/strong><\/h2>\n
A comparison post that gets the click structure wrong wastes the work that came before it. Your CTAs are the layer that determines whether all that writing actually earns commission.<\/p>\n
Where CTAs Should Go throughout the Post<\/h3>\n
Place CTAs at multiple points in the post, not just at the end. A reader who\u2019s already decided by the time they reach the comparison table shouldn\u2019t have to scroll to the bottom to find a link.<\/p>\n
Here are typically the most influential places in your content to drop a CTA:<\/p>\n
- \n
- In the comparison table itself<\/strong> \u2014 usually as a button or text link in a \u201cTry It\u201d or \u201cVisit Site\u201d row at the bottom of each product column<\/li>\n
- At the top of each head-to-head section<\/strong> \u2014 paired with a product display (if you\u2019re using one)<\/li>\n
- In the verdict section<\/strong> \u2014 direct CTAs for whichever product you\u2019re recommending, with a secondary CTA for the alternative<\/li>\n
- In a final summary CTA<\/strong> \u2014 at the very end of the post, often as a side-by-side button block<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Example of an AAWP product comparison table with built in Buy on Amazon buttons placed directly inside the comparison table for each product Source<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n That\u2019s typically four to six CTAs throughout the post, which sounds like a lot but doesn\u2019t feel pushy when the placements are natural and the copy is varied.<\/p>\n
Buttons vs. Text Links vs. Product Displays<\/h3>\n
You actually have three CTA formats to work with in a comparison post, and each one has a different role.<\/p>\n
- \n
- Buttons<\/strong> stand out and drive higher click-through rates, but using them everywhere makes the post feel like a sales page. Use them in the comparison table, in the verdict section, and at the final summary CTA \u2014 moments where you want maximum visual emphasis on the click.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Text links<\/a><\/strong> blend into the content and feel more natural, but they\u2019re easier to scroll past. Use them inside the head-to-head sections, where buttons would interrupt the flow of the analysis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- ThirstyAffiliates Product Displays<\/a><\/strong> are visual product cards that combine an image, key specs, pricing, and a CTA button into one branded block. They\u2019re the strongest fit for anchoring the top of each head-to-head section, where you\u2019re introducing a specific product before getting into the analysis.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/figure>\n
- ThirstyAffiliates Product Displays<\/a><\/strong> are visual product cards that combine an image, key specs, pricing, and a CTA button into one branded block. They\u2019re the strongest fit for anchoring the top of each head-to-head section, where you\u2019re introducing a specific product before getting into the analysis.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- Text links<\/a><\/strong> blend into the content and feel more natural, but they\u2019re easier to scroll past. Use them inside the head-to-head sections, where buttons would interrupt the flow of the analysis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- At the top of each head-to-head section<\/strong> \u2014 paired with a product display (if you\u2019re using one)<\/li>\n
- In the comparison table itself<\/strong> \u2014 usually as a button or text link in a \u201cTry It\u201d or \u201cVisit Site\u201d row at the bottom of each product column<\/li>\n
- What Product A offers<\/strong> in this category \u2014 specific, concrete details<\/li>\n
- Best use case or ideal user<\/strong> \u2014 a one-line summary of who each product is for<\/li>\n
- Pricing<\/strong> \u2014 either lists the entry-level price or price range<\/li>\n
- Tell them what they\u2019ll walk away with.<\/strong> The intro should preview the structure briefly \u2014 that you\u2019ll be looking at features, pricing, ease of use, and ultimately giving a recommendation. Readers stay on posts where they can see the path through.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Frame the decision they\u2019re trying to make.<\/strong> Why do people compare these two specific products? What\u2019s the underlying question they\u2019re trying to answer? The pain point they\u2019re trying to solve? Naming those questions explicitly tells the reader you understand them<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Comparison table<\/strong> \u2014 fast scannable overview of both products<\/li>\n