{"id":288966,"date":"2025-06-11T23:24:19","date_gmt":"2025-06-11T23:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/uncategorized\/be-careful-with-choice-of-law-clauses-in-ic-agreements-who-is-my-employee\/"},"modified":"2025-06-11T23:24:19","modified_gmt":"2025-06-11T23:24:19","slug":"be-careful-with-choice-of-law-clauses-in-ic-agreements-who-is-my-employee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=288966","title":{"rendered":"Be Careful With Choice of Law Clauses in IC Agreements \u2013 Who Is My Employee?"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

The phrase \u201cDifferent strokes for different folks\u201d originated in the 1960s and seems to have been popularized<\/a> by Muhammad Ali. Describing his knock-out punches against Sonny Liston and Floyd Patterson, he said, \u201cI got different strokes for different folks.\u201d<\/p>\n

In 1979, Ali appeared<\/a> in the sitcom \u201cDiff\u2019rent Strokes,\u201d which was probably named for the Ali quote and which was actually spelled that way and I can\u2019t find anything that explains why. I guess when it comes to punctuation, different strokes for different folks?<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s post is a variation on that theme: Different states for different fates.<\/em><\/p>\n

When drafting independent contractor agreements, choice of law matters. Choose carefully and thoughtfully. And remember three things:<\/p>\n

First<\/em>, state laws differ significantly on several subjects that might be relevant to your IC agreement \u2014 for when someone is considered an employee, for when non-competes can be enforced, for when non-solicitation agreements can be enforced, and for other terms that are likely to be in your contractor agreements. Don\u2019t choose the law of a state that is less likely to enforce the clauses you want to include. If you can avoid California law for example, do yourself a favor and avoid California law.<\/p>\n

Second<\/em>, the state you choose needs to have some nexus to the parties or their relationship. Examples of a nexus that can justify use of a state\u2019s law may be that one party is based there, or the work is being performed there, or (maybe) that one party is incorporated there. But there needs to be some connection.<\/p>\n

Third, <\/em>for worker classification disputes, the law of the state where the work is performed might apply anyway, since if a worker works in State A and the laws of State A would consider that person to be an employee, the parties cannot agree to contract out of the law of State A. But don\u2019t concede so easily. Aim to apply the law of a favorable jurisdiction, even if there\u2019s a chance that a court or arbitrator might disregard the choice of law clause in a classification dispute. Besides, there are going to be many other clauses in your agreement for which you\u2019ll want the most favorable state law to apply.<\/p>\n

For employment relationships, it is unlawful in some states (and unenforceable in others) to require application of the law of a state where the work is not performed, but it\u2019s much less clear when and whether such laws apply to non-employment relationships.<\/p>\n

The bottom line: <\/em>Be strategic and thoughtful when inserting a choice of law provision in an independent contractor agreement. Depending on what law is applied to a particular issue or contract clause, the result and enforceability of that term may be different. Or diff\u2019rent. <\/p>\n

And the wrong choice of law could mean a knock-out punch for a clause you\u2019d like to enforce.<\/p>\n

\u00a9 2025 Todd Lebowitz, posted on WhoIsMyEmployee.com, Exploring Issues of Independent Contractor Misclassification and Joint Employment. All rights reserved.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"2018_Web100Badge\"<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n