{"id":265660,"date":"2025-05-31T17:46:58","date_gmt":"2025-05-31T17:46:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/business\/legal\/rubbish-ninth-circuit-upholds-californias-abc-test-rejects-constitutional-challenge-who-is-my-employee\/"},"modified":"2025-05-31T17:46:58","modified_gmt":"2025-05-31T17:46:58","slug":"rubbish-ninth-circuit-upholds-californias-abc-test-rejects-constitutional-challenge-who-is-my-employee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=265660","title":{"rendered":"Rubbish? Ninth Circuit Upholds California\u2019s ABC Test, Rejects Constitutional Challenge \u2013 Who Is My Employee?"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
(AI image generators are fun!)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In 1959, residents of S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil, elected<\/a> Cacareco to city counsel. Cacareco was a five-year and female and lived at the Sao Paulo zoo. She was a big girl, known to eat 70 pounds of vegetables a day. Cacareco was a rhinoceros.<\/p>\n

Cacareco, which means \u201crubbish,\u201d got on the ballot through a student prank. Her success is generally attributed to residents\u2019 frustration with city officials over local conditions, which included unpaved streets and open sewers. Said one local<\/a>, \u201cBetter to elect a rhino than an ass.\u201d<\/p>\n

Back in the U.S., businesses in California have been calling the state\u2019s independent contractor test \u201crubbish\u201d since it went into effect in 2020. A group of truckers, called the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) mounted one of the more persistent challenges to the law, known as AB 5, and that challenge finally resulted in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision earlier this month.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately for the OOIDA and its owner-operator trucker members, the Ninth Circuit upheld<\/a> the constitutionality of AB5 and rejected the truckers\u2019 challenge to the law.<\/p>\n

The truckers had argued that AB 5 violates the dormant Commerce Clause because it imposes a substantial burden on interstate commerce, which outweighs its putative benefits. the truckers also- argued that the law\u2019s business-to-business exception violates the dormant Commerce Clause because it discriminates against interstate commerce and violates the Equal Protection Clause because it treats interstate and intrastate drivers differently. the truckers argued that there is no rational basis to support this alleged disparate treatment.<\/p>\n

The Ninth Circuit saw things differently. In an unpublished opinion, the court rejected each argument and upheld the law.<\/p>\n

The ABC Test appears here to stay, and the chances of getting it overturned now seem about as likely as electing a rhinoceros to the California State Assembly. <\/p>\n

\u00a9 2025 Todd Lebowitz, posted on WhoIsMyEmployee.com, Exploring Issues of Independent Contractor Misclassification and Joint Employment. All rights reserved.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"2018_Web100Badge\"<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n