Post 5083<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nSee the full video at https:\/\/rumble.com\/v6twbgd-fraud-plus-multiple-arrests-and-convictions-requires-defendant-to-serve-ful.html\u00a0<\/a> and at https:\/\/youtu.be\/Of6sz79hyHo<\/a><\/p>\nChutzpah: Serious and Dedicated Criminal Loses Request for Early Release<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/zalma.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/prisoner.png?resize=589%2C332\")
In United States Of America \u00a0v. Chad Lightfoot<\/em>, No. 3:17-CR-00274, United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division (May 6, 2025) the Court dealt with a Motion for Compassionate Release filed by Defendant Chad Lightfoot (\u201cLightfoot\u201d). The United States of America (\u201cthe Government\u201d) opposed the Motion.<\/p>\nBACKGROUND<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nLightfoot is an incarcerated inmate with the Bureau of Prisons (\u201cBOP\u201d). He filed a Motion requesting compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A). Lightfoot alleged extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief based on the criteria set forth in U.S.S.G. \u00a7 1B1.13.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot made false and fraudulent representations to procure funds from a federal disaster relief program. Lightfoot claimed that his residence in Monroe, Louisiana sustained damage from a flood, when in fact, Lightfoot was residing in New Orleans during the time the incident occurred. After a four-day trial, a jury convicted Lightfoot on the sole count of the Indictment.<\/p>\n
SENTENCING<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Court sentenced Lightfoot to 71 months\u2019 imprisonment, followed by 5 years\u2019 supervised release. Lightfoot is expected to be released on December 5, 2025.<\/p>\n
RELEVANT POST CONVICTION LITIGATION<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nOn February 26, 2024, Lightfoot filed a \u201cMotion for Compassionate Release and or Reduction of Sentence (Amendment 821) and Appointment of Counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
LAW & ANALYSIS<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nGenerally, a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. However, \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A) sets forth narrow circumstances where a court may \u201creduce the term of imprisonment\u201d and \u201cimpose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Court may only grant relief when the defendant shows that<\/p>\n
\n- extraordinary and compelling reasons justify a sentence reduction;<\/li>\n
- such a reduction is consistent with applicable statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and<\/li>\n
- early release would be consistent with the sentencing factors in \u00a7 3553(a).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Extraordinary and Compelling Criteria<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nLightfoot must demonstrate that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant reducing his sentence. the Sentencing Commission set forth six specific reasons that can be considered extraordinary and compelling under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A)(i):<\/p>\n
\n- the defendant\u2019s medical condition;<\/li>\n
- defendant\u2019s age;<\/li>\n
- family circumstances;<\/li>\n
- whether defendant has been a victim of abuse during custody;<\/li>\n
- other reasons that are \u201dsimilar in gravity\u201d to reasons one through four; and<\/li>\n
- an extraordinarily long sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Lightfoot points to his \u201cfamily circumstances\u201d as the basis for his Motion. Specifically, Lightfoot claims:<\/p>\n
\n- his four minor children need his financial and emotional support;<\/li>\n
- his mother is suffering from dementia; and<\/li>\n
- he is a possible organ donor candidate for his sister\u2019s kidney transplant procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Lightfoot does not meet or satisfy any of the family circumstances.<\/p>\n
Danger to the Community and Section 3553(a)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nEven if Lightfoot showed extraordinary and compelling reasons for granting relief, the analysis doesn\u2019t end there. Lightfoot\u2019s prior conduct speaks for itself. Lightfoot has been arrested and convicted for several crimes, including, armed robbery, simple and aggravated assault and battery, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and forgery. His last offense involved a fraudulent scheme to receive thousands of dollars from a federal disaster relief by falsely claiming that his Monroe residence sustained damage from a flood. Such offenses pose a danger to the community.<\/p>\n
The USDC concluded that releasing Defendant would be contrary to the Sentencing Commission\u2019s directive that courts should deny compassionate release to defendants who pose a danger to their communities because Defendant\u2019s fraud scheme lasted over a year and caused grave financial and emotional harm to his many victims.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot\u2019s Motion was denied.<\/p>\n
Chutzpah is defined as a person who murders his parents and seeks mercy because he is an orphan. People who commit fraud are, by definition, people with unmitigated gall. After being convicted and sentenced, Mr. Lightfoot tried to cut about a year off his sentence by claiming he needed to care for his children, mother and sick sister. However, the USDC refused because of the clear danger he presents to the people state of Louisiana. Lightfoot\u2019s attempt to reduce his sentence was found by the USDC to be an example of chutzpah and he will serve his full sentence.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/zalma.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/BZTHEA.png?resize=300%2C282\")
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.<\/p>\n
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to my substack at https:\/\/barryzalma.substack.com\/subscribe<\/a><\/p>\nGo to X @bzalma;\u00a0 Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https:\/\/rumble.com\/account\/content?type=all;<\/a> Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library \u2013 <\/a>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/gwEYk<\/a><\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\n
Chutzpah: Serious and Dedicated Criminal Loses Request for Early Release<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nIn United States Of America \u00a0v. Chad Lightfoot<\/em>, No. 3:17-CR-00274, United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division (May 6, 2025) the Court dealt with a Motion for Compassionate Release filed by Defendant Chad Lightfoot (\u201cLightfoot\u201d). The United States of America (\u201cthe Government\u201d) opposed the Motion.<\/p>\nBACKGROUND<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nLightfoot is an incarcerated inmate with the Bureau of Prisons (\u201cBOP\u201d). He filed a Motion requesting compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A). Lightfoot alleged extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief based on the criteria set forth in U.S.S.G. \u00a7 1B1.13.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot made false and fraudulent representations to procure funds from a federal disaster relief program. Lightfoot claimed that his residence in Monroe, Louisiana sustained damage from a flood, when in fact, Lightfoot was residing in New Orleans during the time the incident occurred. After a four-day trial, a jury convicted Lightfoot on the sole count of the Indictment.<\/p>\n
SENTENCING<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Court sentenced Lightfoot to 71 months\u2019 imprisonment, followed by 5 years\u2019 supervised release. Lightfoot is expected to be released on December 5, 2025.<\/p>\n
RELEVANT POST CONVICTION LITIGATION<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nOn February 26, 2024, Lightfoot filed a \u201cMotion for Compassionate Release and or Reduction of Sentence (Amendment 821) and Appointment of Counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
LAW & ANALYSIS<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nGenerally, a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. However, \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A) sets forth narrow circumstances where a court may \u201creduce the term of imprisonment\u201d and \u201cimpose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Court may only grant relief when the defendant shows that<\/p>\n
\n- extraordinary and compelling reasons justify a sentence reduction;<\/li>\n
- such a reduction is consistent with applicable statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and<\/li>\n
- early release would be consistent with the sentencing factors in \u00a7 3553(a).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Extraordinary and Compelling Criteria<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nLightfoot must demonstrate that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant reducing his sentence. the Sentencing Commission set forth six specific reasons that can be considered extraordinary and compelling under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A)(i):<\/p>\n
\n- the defendant\u2019s medical condition;<\/li>\n
- defendant\u2019s age;<\/li>\n
- family circumstances;<\/li>\n
- whether defendant has been a victim of abuse during custody;<\/li>\n
- other reasons that are \u201dsimilar in gravity\u201d to reasons one through four; and<\/li>\n
- an extraordinarily long sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Lightfoot points to his \u201cfamily circumstances\u201d as the basis for his Motion. Specifically, Lightfoot claims:<\/p>\n
\n- his four minor children need his financial and emotional support;<\/li>\n
- his mother is suffering from dementia; and<\/li>\n
- he is a possible organ donor candidate for his sister\u2019s kidney transplant procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Lightfoot does not meet or satisfy any of the family circumstances.<\/p>\n
Danger to the Community and Section 3553(a)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nEven if Lightfoot showed extraordinary and compelling reasons for granting relief, the analysis doesn\u2019t end there. Lightfoot\u2019s prior conduct speaks for itself. Lightfoot has been arrested and convicted for several crimes, including, armed robbery, simple and aggravated assault and battery, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and forgery. His last offense involved a fraudulent scheme to receive thousands of dollars from a federal disaster relief by falsely claiming that his Monroe residence sustained damage from a flood. Such offenses pose a danger to the community.<\/p>\n
The USDC concluded that releasing Defendant would be contrary to the Sentencing Commission\u2019s directive that courts should deny compassionate release to defendants who pose a danger to their communities because Defendant\u2019s fraud scheme lasted over a year and caused grave financial and emotional harm to his many victims.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot\u2019s Motion was denied.<\/p>\n
Chutzpah is defined as a person who murders his parents and seeks mercy because he is an orphan. People who commit fraud are, by definition, people with unmitigated gall. After being convicted and sentenced, Mr. Lightfoot tried to cut about a year off his sentence by claiming he needed to care for his children, mother and sick sister. However, the USDC refused because of the clear danger he presents to the people state of Louisiana. Lightfoot\u2019s attempt to reduce his sentence was found by the USDC to be an example of chutzpah and he will serve his full sentence.<\/p>\n
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.<\/p>\n
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to my substack at https:\/\/barryzalma.substack.com\/subscribe<\/a><\/p>\nGo to X @bzalma;\u00a0 Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https:\/\/rumble.com\/account\/content?type=all;<\/a> Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library \u2013 <\/a>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/gwEYk<\/a><\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\n
In United States Of America \u00a0v. Chad Lightfoot<\/em>, No. 3:17-CR-00274, United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division (May 6, 2025) the Court dealt with a Motion for Compassionate Release filed by Defendant Chad Lightfoot (\u201cLightfoot\u201d). The United States of America (\u201cthe Government\u201d) opposed the Motion.<\/p>\nBACKGROUND<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nLightfoot is an incarcerated inmate with the Bureau of Prisons (\u201cBOP\u201d). He filed a Motion requesting compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A). Lightfoot alleged extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief based on the criteria set forth in U.S.S.G. \u00a7 1B1.13.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot made false and fraudulent representations to procure funds from a federal disaster relief program. Lightfoot claimed that his residence in Monroe, Louisiana sustained damage from a flood, when in fact, Lightfoot was residing in New Orleans during the time the incident occurred. After a four-day trial, a jury convicted Lightfoot on the sole count of the Indictment.<\/p>\n
SENTENCING<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Court sentenced Lightfoot to 71 months\u2019 imprisonment, followed by 5 years\u2019 supervised release. Lightfoot is expected to be released on December 5, 2025.<\/p>\n
RELEVANT POST CONVICTION LITIGATION<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nOn February 26, 2024, Lightfoot filed a \u201cMotion for Compassionate Release and or Reduction of Sentence (Amendment 821) and Appointment of Counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
LAW & ANALYSIS<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nGenerally, a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. However, \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A) sets forth narrow circumstances where a court may \u201creduce the term of imprisonment\u201d and \u201cimpose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Court may only grant relief when the defendant shows that<\/p>\n
\n- extraordinary and compelling reasons justify a sentence reduction;<\/li>\n
- such a reduction is consistent with applicable statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and<\/li>\n
- early release would be consistent with the sentencing factors in \u00a7 3553(a).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Extraordinary and Compelling Criteria<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nLightfoot must demonstrate that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant reducing his sentence. the Sentencing Commission set forth six specific reasons that can be considered extraordinary and compelling under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A)(i):<\/p>\n
\n- the defendant\u2019s medical condition;<\/li>\n
- defendant\u2019s age;<\/li>\n
- family circumstances;<\/li>\n
- whether defendant has been a victim of abuse during custody;<\/li>\n
- other reasons that are \u201dsimilar in gravity\u201d to reasons one through four; and<\/li>\n
- an extraordinarily long sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Lightfoot points to his \u201cfamily circumstances\u201d as the basis for his Motion. Specifically, Lightfoot claims:<\/p>\n
\n- his four minor children need his financial and emotional support;<\/li>\n
- his mother is suffering from dementia; and<\/li>\n
- he is a possible organ donor candidate for his sister\u2019s kidney transplant procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Lightfoot does not meet or satisfy any of the family circumstances.<\/p>\n
Danger to the Community and Section 3553(a)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nEven if Lightfoot showed extraordinary and compelling reasons for granting relief, the analysis doesn\u2019t end there. Lightfoot\u2019s prior conduct speaks for itself. Lightfoot has been arrested and convicted for several crimes, including, armed robbery, simple and aggravated assault and battery, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and forgery. His last offense involved a fraudulent scheme to receive thousands of dollars from a federal disaster relief by falsely claiming that his Monroe residence sustained damage from a flood. Such offenses pose a danger to the community.<\/p>\n
The USDC concluded that releasing Defendant would be contrary to the Sentencing Commission\u2019s directive that courts should deny compassionate release to defendants who pose a danger to their communities because Defendant\u2019s fraud scheme lasted over a year and caused grave financial and emotional harm to his many victims.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot\u2019s Motion was denied.<\/p>\n
Chutzpah is defined as a person who murders his parents and seeks mercy because he is an orphan. People who commit fraud are, by definition, people with unmitigated gall. After being convicted and sentenced, Mr. Lightfoot tried to cut about a year off his sentence by claiming he needed to care for his children, mother and sick sister. However, the USDC refused because of the clear danger he presents to the people state of Louisiana. Lightfoot\u2019s attempt to reduce his sentence was found by the USDC to be an example of chutzpah and he will serve his full sentence.<\/p>\n
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.<\/p>\n
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to my substack at https:\/\/barryzalma.substack.com\/subscribe<\/a><\/p>\nGo to X @bzalma;\u00a0 Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https:\/\/rumble.com\/account\/content?type=all;<\/a> Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library \u2013 <\/a>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/gwEYk<\/a><\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\n
The Court sentenced Lightfoot to 71 months\u2019 imprisonment, followed by 5 years\u2019 supervised release. Lightfoot is expected to be released on December 5, 2025.<\/p>\n
RELEVANT POST CONVICTION LITIGATION<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nOn February 26, 2024, Lightfoot filed a \u201cMotion for Compassionate Release and or Reduction of Sentence (Amendment 821) and Appointment of Counsel.\u201d<\/p>\n
LAW & ANALYSIS<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\nGenerally, a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. However, \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A) sets forth narrow circumstances where a court may \u201creduce the term of imprisonment\u201d and \u201cimpose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Court may only grant relief when the defendant shows that<\/p>\n
\n- extraordinary and compelling reasons justify a sentence reduction;<\/li>\n
- such a reduction is consistent with applicable statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and<\/li>\n
- early release would be consistent with the sentencing factors in \u00a7 3553(a).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Extraordinary and Compelling Criteria<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nLightfoot must demonstrate that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant reducing his sentence. the Sentencing Commission set forth six specific reasons that can be considered extraordinary and compelling under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A)(i):<\/p>\n
\n- the defendant\u2019s medical condition;<\/li>\n
- defendant\u2019s age;<\/li>\n
- family circumstances;<\/li>\n
- whether defendant has been a victim of abuse during custody;<\/li>\n
- other reasons that are \u201dsimilar in gravity\u201d to reasons one through four; and<\/li>\n
- an extraordinarily long sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Lightfoot points to his \u201cfamily circumstances\u201d as the basis for his Motion. Specifically, Lightfoot claims:<\/p>\n
\n- his four minor children need his financial and emotional support;<\/li>\n
- his mother is suffering from dementia; and<\/li>\n
- he is a possible organ donor candidate for his sister\u2019s kidney transplant procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Lightfoot does not meet or satisfy any of the family circumstances.<\/p>\n
Danger to the Community and Section 3553(a)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\nEven if Lightfoot showed extraordinary and compelling reasons for granting relief, the analysis doesn\u2019t end there. Lightfoot\u2019s prior conduct speaks for itself. Lightfoot has been arrested and convicted for several crimes, including, armed robbery, simple and aggravated assault and battery, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and forgery. His last offense involved a fraudulent scheme to receive thousands of dollars from a federal disaster relief by falsely claiming that his Monroe residence sustained damage from a flood. Such offenses pose a danger to the community.<\/p>\n
The USDC concluded that releasing Defendant would be contrary to the Sentencing Commission\u2019s directive that courts should deny compassionate release to defendants who pose a danger to their communities because Defendant\u2019s fraud scheme lasted over a year and caused grave financial and emotional harm to his many victims.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot\u2019s Motion was denied.<\/p>\n
Chutzpah is defined as a person who murders his parents and seeks mercy because he is an orphan. People who commit fraud are, by definition, people with unmitigated gall. After being convicted and sentenced, Mr. Lightfoot tried to cut about a year off his sentence by claiming he needed to care for his children, mother and sick sister. However, the USDC refused because of the clear danger he presents to the people state of Louisiana. Lightfoot\u2019s attempt to reduce his sentence was found by the USDC to be an example of chutzpah and he will serve his full sentence.<\/p>\n
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.<\/p>\n
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to my substack at https:\/\/barryzalma.substack.com\/subscribe<\/a><\/p>\nGo to X @bzalma;\u00a0 Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https:\/\/rumble.com\/account\/content?type=all;<\/a> Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library \u2013 <\/a>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/gwEYk<\/a><\/p>\n\nLike this:<\/h3>\n
Generally, a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. However, \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A) sets forth narrow circumstances where a court may \u201creduce the term of imprisonment\u201d and \u201cimpose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Court may only grant relief when the defendant shows that<\/p>\n
- \n
- extraordinary and compelling reasons justify a sentence reduction;<\/li>\n
- such a reduction is consistent with applicable statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and<\/li>\n
- early release would be consistent with the sentencing factors in \u00a7 3553(a).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Extraordinary and Compelling Criteria<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
Lightfoot must demonstrate that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant reducing his sentence. the Sentencing Commission set forth six specific reasons that can be considered extraordinary and compelling under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3582(c)(1)(A)(i):<\/p>\n
- \n
- the defendant\u2019s medical condition;<\/li>\n
- defendant\u2019s age;<\/li>\n
- family circumstances;<\/li>\n
- whether defendant has been a victim of abuse during custody;<\/li>\n
- other reasons that are \u201dsimilar in gravity\u201d to reasons one through four; and<\/li>\n
- an extraordinarily long sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Lightfoot points to his \u201cfamily circumstances\u201d as the basis for his Motion. Specifically, Lightfoot claims:<\/p>\n
- \n
- his four minor children need his financial and emotional support;<\/li>\n
- his mother is suffering from dementia; and<\/li>\n
- he is a possible organ donor candidate for his sister\u2019s kidney transplant procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Lightfoot does not meet or satisfy any of the family circumstances.<\/p>\n
Danger to the Community and Section 3553(a)<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n
Even if Lightfoot showed extraordinary and compelling reasons for granting relief, the analysis doesn\u2019t end there. Lightfoot\u2019s prior conduct speaks for itself. Lightfoot has been arrested and convicted for several crimes, including, armed robbery, simple and aggravated assault and battery, bank fraud, insurance fraud, and forgery. His last offense involved a fraudulent scheme to receive thousands of dollars from a federal disaster relief by falsely claiming that his Monroe residence sustained damage from a flood. Such offenses pose a danger to the community.<\/p>\n
The USDC concluded that releasing Defendant would be contrary to the Sentencing Commission\u2019s directive that courts should deny compassionate release to defendants who pose a danger to their communities because Defendant\u2019s fraud scheme lasted over a year and caused grave financial and emotional harm to his many victims.<\/p>\n
Lightfoot\u2019s Motion was denied.<\/p>\n
Chutzpah is defined as a person who murders his parents and seeks mercy because he is an orphan. People who commit fraud are, by definition, people with unmitigated gall. After being convicted and sentenced, Mr. Lightfoot tried to cut about a year off his sentence by claiming he needed to care for his children, mother and sick sister. However, the USDC refused because of the clear danger he presents to the people state of Louisiana. Lightfoot\u2019s attempt to reduce his sentence was found by the USDC to be an example of chutzpah and he will serve his full sentence.<\/p>\n
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.<\/p>\nPlease tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.<\/p>\n
Subscribe to my substack at https:\/\/barryzalma.substack.com\/subscribe<\/a><\/p>\n
Go to X @bzalma;\u00a0 Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https:\/\/rumble.com\/account\/content?type=all;<\/a> Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library \u2013 <\/a>https:\/\/lnkd.in\/gwEYk<\/a><\/p>\n
\nLike this:<\/h3>\n