{"id":215222,"date":"2025-04-30T18:11:45","date_gmt":"2025-04-30T18:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/anthropology\/what-the-absence-of-lullabies-and-dance-among-the-ache-tells-us-about-human-culture\/"},"modified":"2025-04-30T18:11:45","modified_gmt":"2025-04-30T18:11:45","slug":"what-the-absence-of-lullabies-and-dance-among-the-ache-tells-us-about-human-culture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=215222","title":{"rendered":"What the Absence of Lullabies and Dance Among the Ach\u00e9 Tells Us About Human Culture"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

In the humid forests of eastern Paraguay, where the tall canopies hush the chatter of insects and wind, researchers have observed something unexpected: a society that lives without song and dance. Not entirely without music\u2014but without two particular forms long thought universal among humans\u2014lullabies and communal dancing.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/p>\n
\"\"<\/picture><\/div>\n

<\/a>

(From left) A Northern Ach\u00e9 mother uses tickling to calm an infant (photo by Kim Hill); Southern Ach\u00e9 individuals play flutes and dance collectively (photo by Bjarne Fostervold); and a Northern Ach\u00e9 hunter blows on the embers of a burning stick to keep it lit \u2014 having lost the ability to make fire, men and women preserved fire in this way (photo by Kim Hill). Photos published in the journal Current Biology.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

A recent study published in <\/span>Current Biology<\/span><\/em> by Manvir Singh and Kim Hill draws from four decades of intimate ethnographic work among the Northern Ach\u00e9, an Indigenous community whose lifestyle once depended heavily on foraging and hunting. The findings call into question some of the foundational ideas in evolutionary anthropology about the universality of music, and specifically its social functions.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cDance and infant-related song are widely considered universal\u2014a view that has been supported by cross-cultural research, including my own,\u201d Singh writes in the study. \u201cAnd this conclusion, in turn, informs evolutionary theorizing about music\u2019s origins.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Between 1977 and 2020, Hill\u2014an anthropologist at Arizona State University\u2014spent over ten years living with Northern Ach\u00e9 families. He documented daily life, language, gossip, mourning rituals, and much more. What he never witnessed, however, was anyone dancing. Nor did he observe parents singing to their babies.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cI lived with the Ach\u00e9, I ate meals with them,\u201d Hill recalls. \u201cI was in really intimate proximity to them. I listened to them gossip, I listened to the kids crying.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This absence is all the more surprising because singing is not foreign to the Ach\u00e9. Men often sing solo\u2014sometimes about a recent hunt, sometimes in reflection on interpersonal conflicts. Women may sing too, especially about the dead. But the musical expression is solitary and unscripted, and it steers clear of infants. There are no lullabies, no shared tunes for soothing children to sleep.<\/p>\n

So how could a community lose something as seemingly basic as dancing?<\/p>\n

The researchers offer two explanations. First is a historical bottleneck. During intense population pressures in the 20th century\u2014including displacement and increased contact with outsiders\u2014several traditional Ach\u00e9 practices disappeared. These included fire-making, horticulture, puberty ceremonies, and even shamanic practices. Music may have eroded alongside these.<\/p>\n

A second possibility is more recent: the impact of missionary activity. As the Northern Ach\u00e9 settled onto permanent reservations, external influences\u2014both subtle and overt\u2014contributed to the loss of traditional cultural practices. In some cases, this included the suppression of ritual and music.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cIt\u2019s not that the Northern Ach\u00e9 don\u2019t have any need for lullabies,\u201d Singh notes. \u201cAch\u00e9 parents still calm fussy infants. They use playful speech, funny faces, smiling and giggling.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This raises an important point. Lullabies are not the only way to soothe children. But they are, according to most anthropological surveys, the <\/span>most common<\/em> way across cultures. Which is why their absence here is so revealing.<\/span><\/p>\n

The loss of lullabies and dance doesn\u2019t negate the idea that humans may have evolved to find these behaviors rewarding. But it does challenge how those traits are sustained. Rather than being hardwired and inevitable\u2014like smiling or crying\u2014the study suggests that song and dance are more like fire-making: cultural inventions that must be taught, maintained, and transmitted.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThis doesn\u2019t refute the possibility that humans have genetically evolved adaptations for dancing and responding to lullabies,\u201d Singh explains. \u201cIt does mean, however, that cultural transmission matters much more\u2026 than many researchers, including myself, have suspected.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

That distinction matters. If lullabies and dancing are learned behaviors, then their survival depends on the communities that carry them. They\u2019re not evolutionary certainties\u2014they\u2019re cultural achievements, and like all such achievements, they can vanish.<\/p>\n

What does this mean for anthropology?<\/p>\n

The belief in cultural universals\u2014those traits presumed to be shared by all human societies\u2014has long shaped how scholars understand evolution, language, and art. Song and dance often sit near the top of such lists, underpinned by arguments about social bonding, infant care, and community cohesion.<\/p>\n

But as the Northern Ach\u00e9 show, cultural practices\u2014even those that seem deeply embedded\u2014can be lost. Their absence doesn\u2019t suggest inferiority or lack. It merely points to a different historical trajectory.<\/p>\n

Anthropologist Michelle Scalise Sugiyama once argued that music is a kind of cognitive fossil: a behavior passed down from ancestral environments to modern contexts, often preserving clues about the past. If so, then the Northern Ach\u00e9\u2019s silence is equally revealing\u2014a fossil not of continuity, but of absence.<\/p>\n

Today, younger generations of the Northern Ach\u00e9 are growing up in a changing world. Missionary influences, access to education, and integration with broader Paraguayan society are reshaping language, rituals, and possibly reintroducing music.<\/p>\n

But for now, the Ach\u00e9 remain a rare reminder: culture is fragile. It is shaped not just by environment and biology, but by history, memory, and loss.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWe may be changing all kinds of things without knowing it,\u201d Singh observes. \u201cAnd I don\u2019t know if that\u2019s good or bad, but it\u2019s a little worrying that we have no idea what we\u2019re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n