{"id":182795,"date":"2025-04-13T13:27:32","date_gmt":"2025-04-13T13:27:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/peraltafinancing.com\/business\/legal\/aluko-v-barton-preliminary-issues-trial-court-finds-former-footballers-tweets-were-defamatory\/"},"modified":"2025-04-13T13:27:32","modified_gmt":"2025-04-13T13:27:32","slug":"aluko-v-barton-preliminary-issues-trial-court-finds-former-footballers-tweets-were-defamatory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795","title":{"rendered":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer’s tweets were defamatory"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

We have written previously<\/a> about the libel troubles of former footballer Joey Barton as a result of his antics on X\/Twitter.\u00a0 Those troubles continue in the form of a judgment on a preliminary issues trial resulting from his tweets about fellow former footballer, Eni Aluko, by Mr Justice Lavender in Aluko v Barton <\/em>[2025] EWHC 853 (KB)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The tweets in issue<\/strong><\/p>\n

On the morning of 17 January 2025, Barton tweeted:-<\/p>\n

\u201cCry me a fucking river\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

I was waiting for the victim card to be played.<\/em><\/p>\n

Eni, sorry luv, you’re dreadful as a pundit.<\/em><\/p>\n

Tone deaf, can’t count and most importantly you know next to nothing about men’s football.<\/em><\/p>\n

You should have ran off to a desert island after your ‘Arteta phoning Pep to put a bid’ in nonsense.<\/em><\/p>\n

Everyone is laughing at you. <\/em><\/p>\n

Not just me. <\/em>\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Below this text Barton included a headline from an online video about Aluko, which read \u201cEni Aluko speaks on online abuse, hate speech, harassment towards women in football broadcasting\u201d<\/em> and a link to a video of Aluko speaking about these subjects (\u2018the Victim Card Post<\/strong>\u2019).<\/p>\n

Later, on the afternoon of 17 January 2025, Barton tweeted \u201cSurprise surprise <\/em> \u201d<\/em> above a screenshot of a Guardian website article from August 2017, which showed a picture of former footballer Eni Aluko and, amongst other things, the headline \u201cFA faces calls for fresh investigation after Eni Aluko\u2019s claims of racism and bullying\u201d <\/em>(\u2018the First Post<\/strong>\u2019).<\/p>\n

Two days later, on 19 January 2025, Barton tweeted:-<\/p>\n

\u201cMore has come to light about poor, little Eni Aluko.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dad was a Nigerian Senator. Dodgy money. Ran to England. Massive house in Wentworth. 3 Rolls Royce’s <\/em>[sic]. St Mary’s in Ascot private education.<\/em><\/p>\n

Lawyer. Race card player.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Below this text Barton included a photograph of Aluko from the BBC, which had the headline \u201cAluko apologises for furlough tweets\u201d <\/em>and a link to an article which reported on Aluko apologising for criticising those on the government\u2019s furlough scheme during the Covid-19 pandemic (\u2018the Second Post<\/strong>\u2019).<\/p>\n

The trial of preliminary issues<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lavendar J was asked to determine:-<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The natural and ordinary meaning of the First Post and the Second Post;<\/li>\n
  2. The meaning of the First Post to readers who had also read the Victim Card Post (an \u2018innuendo\u2019 meaning);<\/li>\n
  3. Whether the First Post and\/or the Second Post contained statements of fact or opinion; and<\/li>\n
  4. Whether the meanings found were defamatory.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The parties\u2019 arguments<\/u><\/p>\n

    The First Post<\/em><\/p>\n

    Both parties argued that the \u2018natural and ordinary\u2019 and \u2018innuendo\u2019 meaning of the First Post was the same:-<\/p>\n

    Aluko argued the First Post meant \u201cthe Claimant made dishonest and unwarranted racism and bullying claims in respect of her participation in the England Women’s football team as part of a pattern of bad faith complaints of discrimination.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    Barton argued the First Post meant \u201cthe situation with regard to calls from anti-racism groups for the FA to open a fresh investigation into the Claimant’s contested clams <\/em>[sic] of racism and bullying which had been investigated 6 years earlier was laughable but predictable\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    The Second Post<\/em><\/p>\n

    Aluko argued the Second Post meant that she \u201c(a) is a hypocrite for criticising a culture of entitlement when she is herself the beneficiary of dodgy money which her father pocketed through being a corrupt Nigerian senator and which has paid for her to have a lavish lifestyle with an enormous house, three Rolls Royce cars and a private education, and (b) has persistently made dishonest and unwarranted complaints about racism in order to gain unjustified advantages.”<\/em><\/p>\n

    Barton argued the Second Post meant that \u201c(1) the Claimant had acted hypocritically in publicly criticising the Covid-19 furlough scheme on the basis that by paying 80% of the salaries of employees earning up to \u00a32,500 pcm, it was encouraging in those employees a culture of entitlement and\/or a “do-nothing” mentality, when she had been brought up in an affluent household and had enjoyed the benefits of that affluence, namely a very large house in an affluent area; luxurious cars and a private education, and (2) the Claimant had raised the issue of race in the context of arguments or discussions.”<\/em><\/p>\n

    The Judge\u2019s decisions<\/u><\/p>\n

    Meanings<\/em><\/p>\n

    Lavender J found that the natural and ordinary meaning of the First Post meant \u201cIt was both predictable and laughable that the Football Association had faced calls for a fresh investigation into its handling of the claimant’s claims of racism and bullying.\u201d <\/em>The Judge rejected the parties\u2019 submissions that the innuendo meaning was the same as the natural and ordinary one, and found that the innuendo meaning of the First post was “In making claims of racism and bullying in respect of her participation in the England women’s football team the claimant cynically sought to exploit her status as an alleged victim of racism and bullying, her claim to be a victim of racism and bullying was unwarranted and it was both predictable and laughable that she acted in this way.”<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    From this we can see that while Barton will be the far happier party on the decision of the natural and ordinary meaning (see why below), the Judge\u2019s decision on the innuendo meaning falls somewhere between that contended for by the parties.\u00a0 Importantly, for Aluko, the innuendo meaning includes that she \u201ccynically sought to exploit her status as an alleged victim of racism\u201d<\/em> which is, in effect, a finding that an allegation of \u201cplaying the race card\u201d<\/em> is cynical and\/or dishonest (though the Judge avoided using the word dishonest).\u00a0 Aluko will no doubt be content with the innuendo meaning found, which is likely to be very difficult for Barton to substantiate is true (if it is his intention to advance a truth defence).\u00a0 The key point here is that in order to prove the substantial truth of this meaning, Barton would need to obtain findings of fact about Aluko\u2019s mental state when \u201cplaying the race card\u201d<\/em>, which one would expect most judges to be very <\/em>slow to find.<\/p>\n

    The Judge went on to decide that the Second Post meant \u201cThe claimant was a hypocrite for saying that the furlough scheme created a “do-nothing” mentality and a “culture of entitlement” when she was herself the beneficiary of dodgy money obtained by her father, a Nigerian senator who ran to England, which has paid for her to have a massive house, three Rolls Royce cars and a private education\u201d <\/em>and, separately, that \u201cThe claimant has on at least one occasion cynically sought to exploit her race.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 Here, again, the Judge has found a meaning somewhat less injurious than the one Aluko contended for, but in key areas more serious than that Baron sought.\u00a0 Critically, the \u201ccynically sought to exploit her race\u201d<\/em> will, again, require a Judge to make findings about Aluko\u2019s state of mind if Barton is to succeed on a truth defence: a very high bar.<\/p>\n

    Fact or opinion<\/em><\/p>\n

    The Judge found that the First Post (both its natural and ordinary meaning and its innuendo meaning) was a statement of opinion.\u00a0 The Judge found that the first part of the Second Post was a statement of opinion, but that it was a statement of fact that Aluko had \u201con at least one occasion cynically sought to exploit her race\u201d<\/em>.\u00a0 This being a statement of fact presents real difficulties for Barton at trial.<\/p>\n

    Defamatory \u2018at common law\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n

    The Judge found that the First Post was not defamatory in its natural and ordinary meaning, as, in that meaning, it did not refer to or criticise Aluko at all \u2013 it was about the conduct of the Football Association.\u00a0 The judge found all other meanings to be defamatory of Aluko.<\/p>\n

    Comment<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Because the majority of the publications have been found to be defamatory of Aluko, the mainstream media reporting of the judgment has been skewed towards an Aluko \u201cwin\u201d.\u00a0 The Independent\u2019s headline described her \u201cwinning first stage of libel case against Joey Barton\u201d<\/em>.\u00a0 Whilst it is common for trials of preliminary issues to leave one party in a weaker position (the case they had been intending to advance no longer working with the decided meanings or fact\/opinion outcome) there are very few outcomes where a party technically wins or loses at such a hearing.\u00a0 In this case, the only total loss was actually Aluko\u2019s: it is now not possible for her to succeed in her claim on the natural and ordinary meaning of the First Post, the Judge having decided it is not defamatory of her at all.<\/p>\n

    Cases frequently settle after a meaning determination (as was the case following the preliminary issues trial in Vine v Barton<\/em>\u00a0[2024] EWHC 1268 (KB)<\/a>).\u00a0 Alternatively, Barton can seek to appeal the decision or try to defend the claim at trial (notwithstanding the above obstacles). \u00a0Given the Judge\u2019s clear reference to settled authorities on how to determine meaning, and balance in the decision, it is not clear how the preliminary decision can be challenged.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    We have written previously about the libel troubles of former footballer Joey Barton as a result of his antics on X\/Twitter.\u00a0 Those troubles continue in the form of a judgment on a preliminary issues trial resulting from his tweets about fellow former footballer, Eni Aluko, by Mr Justice Lavender in Aluko v Barton [2025] EWHC […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97],"tags":[72208,5389,410,72209,16649,49220,15332,34341,13623,20836],"dealstore":[],"offerexpiration":[],"class_list":["post-182795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal","tag-aluko","tag-barton","tag-court","tag-defamatory","tag-finds","tag-footballers","tag-issues","tag-preliminary","tag-trial","tag-tweets"],"yoast_head":"\nAluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We have written previously about the libel troubles of former footballer Joey Barton as a result of his antics on X\/Twitter.\u00a0 Those troubles continue in the form of a judgment on a preliminary issues trial resulting from his tweets about fellow former footballer, Eni Aluko, by Mr Justice Lavender in Aluko v Barton [2025] EWHC […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Som2ny Network\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\"},\"headline\":\"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer’s tweets were defamatory\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\"},\"wordCount\":1498,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Aluko\",\"Barton\",\"Court\",\"defamatory\",\"Finds\",\"footballers\",\"Issues\",\"Preliminary\",\"Trial\",\"Tweets\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Legal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\",\"name\":\"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer’s tweets were defamatory\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"description\":\"Daily Deals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Som2ny Network\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":86,\"caption\":\"Som2ny Network\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network","og_description":"We have written previously about the libel troubles of former footballer Joey Barton as a result of his antics on X\/Twitter.\u00a0 Those troubles continue in the form of a judgment on a preliminary issues trial resulting from his tweets about fellow former footballer, Eni Aluko, by Mr Justice Lavender in Aluko v Barton [2025] EWHC […]","og_url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795","og_site_name":"Som2ny Network","article_published_time":"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371"},"headline":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer’s tweets were defamatory","datePublished":"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795"},"wordCount":1498,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"keywords":["Aluko","Barton","Court","defamatory","Finds","footballers","Issues","Preliminary","Trial","Tweets"],"articleSection":["Legal"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795","name":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer's tweets were defamatory - Som2ny Network","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-13T13:27:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?p=182795#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?bp_activities=1"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Aluko v Barton preliminary issues trial: Court finds former footballer’s tweets were defamatory"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","name":"Som2ny Network","description":"Daily Deals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#organization","name":"Som2ny Network","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4a0953c4-logo-300x86-1.png","width":300,"height":86,"caption":"Som2ny Network"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b85e3c3dc0e1daea076524dc8810c371","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/729ae85bf62b9917e93538db2f2688ca?s=96&r=g&default=https%3A%2F%2Ffivemor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fplugins%2Fbuddypress-first-letter-avatar%2Fimages%2Fdefault%2F96%2Flatin_a.png","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/fivemor.com"],"url":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=182795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=182795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=182795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=182795"},{"taxonomy":"dealstore","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fdealstore&post=182795"},{"taxonomy":"offerexpiration","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fivemor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fofferexpiration&post=182795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}