Rene Gomez was one of the most renowned potato curators at the International Potato Center<\/a> (CIP, Centro Internacional de la Papa in Spanish). Potato curators provide reliable advice in safeguarding the CIP collection, carrying out key activities such as the acquisition, registration, cleaning, storage, regeneration, and distribution of seeds and other planting materials. Gomez\u2019s 35-year journey with CIP left a remarkable legacy among potato conservation experts. I met him in February 2023 during my dissertation field work in Peru. I spent many hours listening to his life story, during which I learned how his work was connected to CIP\u2019s history and research, about his dedication to his work, and about his concern for the future of potato curation. \u201cWe are an endangered species, us taxonomists and curators,\u201d he mentioned. Gomez was worried about the precarity of the field, particularly the lack of young people who would continue his work after his retirement.<\/p>\n The unexpected passing of Gomez (April 19, 2024) left a void in the world of potato conservation and among those who knew him. I had been coding and reviewing the interview transcripts I recorded during my field work when I learned about his death. Many people that I interviewed mentioned Gomez in one way or another. A passionate advocate for potato biodiversity, Gomez dedicated his life to preserving the rich heritage of potato varieties, knowing that his work at CIP genebank supported Andean farmers\u2019 livelihoods and promoted sustainable practices. His commitment to mentorship fostered a culture of collaboration, inspiring colleagues and mentees alike. Public comments on the In Memoriam Rene Gomez Facebook Page (April 24, 2024) attest to his impact on colleagues, friends and research collaborators.<\/p>\n Gomez\u2019s death represents, in a way, the end of a generation of genebank scientists that prioritized knowledge production and community engagement. This generation included Carlos Ochoa, perhaps one of the more renowned Peruvian scientists, who conducted several expeditions to collect potato varieties from many regions of the Andes, including Chile and Bolivia. Both Gomez and Ochoa spoke Quechua, came from Cusco, and had their own private potato collections before joining CIP. They also faced similar challenges regarding the preservation of CIP\u2019s collection during the 1980s, when guerrillas made difficult expeditions in the Andes (Spooner et al. 1999, Huaman & Schmiediche 1999). Gomez developed terms and methods that influenced CIP\u2019s conservation approach, including \u201crepatriation\u201d and \u201cdynamic conservation.\u201d Ochoa published editions of The Potatoes of South America on Bolivia (Ochoa 2004) and Peru (Ochoa 1990), which have become foundational works for potato conservation experts. Gomez and Ochoa trained the next generations of potato conservation experts, but, as I discuss below, the participatory research at CIP at times seemed uncertain and fragmented (Thiele et al. 2001), even though it is still a core component of CIP research programs.<\/p>\n Andean farmers are also experiencing a generational change, as older generations of farmers look to younger generations for marketing potatoes to new regional markets. Smallholders in Peru have protected Andean biodiversity for centuries, and Andean potatoes are intimately connected with Andean culture and religion (Yin 2016) and have nutritional qualities that make them the basis of Andean diet (De Haan 2019). Most potatoes have Quechua names that represent the dynamic way Andean farmers interact with them, since the names represent customs, farming tools, local fauna and flora. During my field work, I observed how farmers have expanded the diversity of potato products through marketing to urban consumers, high-end restaurants, and food processing companies. At regional and national food fairs, potatoes are sold in the form of vodka, chips, and tubers. The Peruvian gastronomic boom has led to the promotion of Andean foods in different markets (Matta 2014, Garcia 2021), and projects focusing on rural infrastructure, the expansion of supermarkets, fostering strong relationships between producers and the urban gastronomic sector have contributed to this growth (Campos and Ortiz 2020).<\/p>\n While potato farmers have been referred to as \u201cguardians\u201d of agrobiodiversity in this context (Huanay 2023), little attention has been paid to the precarity of this continuing guardianship. The lack of youth and women farmers present at annual meetings and events puts into question who will be the agrodiversity guardians when the older generations of potato farmers pass on. In this post, I assess the future uncertainty of potato agrobiodiversity by exploring CIP\u2019s participatory research and engagement, as well as the interaction between ex situ (lab) and in situ (farm) conservation.<\/p>\n For more than 50 years, CIP has been working alongside custodian farmers to increase potato agrobiodiversity conservation. Founded in 1971 as a research-for-development center, CIP is part of the CGIAR network, a global partnership of research centers that focus on subsistence crops such as corn, rice, and sweet potato. CIP provides plant genetic material to farmers, and researchers based in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. CIP\u2019s research resonates beyond Peru, and farmers from neighboring countries have come to Peru to learn about conservation practices. Interactions among potato farmers, researchers, technicians, government agencies have shaped the potato value chain in Peru, due to promotional initiatives such as the International Potato Day (Ordinola 2023). With the development of strategies to improve smallholders\u2019 access to markets, to include farmers in research, and to conduct nutrition related research (Ortiz et al. 2020), CIP has diversified its participatory research portfolio.<\/p>\n Gomez\u2019s community-engaged work shaped CIP\u2019s potato collection conservation and distribution protocols. Fluent in Quechua, Gomez conducted workshops with potato farmers from the Potato Park in Cusco, a conservation area dedicated to preserving the genetic diversity of Andean potatoes that was established in collaboration with Quechua Indigenous communities. These workshops were designed to help farmers reintroduce varieties that had been lost in previous years. CIP\u2019s reintroduction activities, undertaken through its repatriation program, aim to return varieties collected by scientists years ago to protect agrobiodiversity against environmental and social factors, such as climate change and political violence (L\u00fcttringhaus et al. 2021, Ellis et al. 2020).<\/p>\n In order to communicate potato genetics to a non-scientific audience in the Andes, Gomez invented a tool that he called a \u201cmolecular quipu.\u201d The tool represents plant genetics using the more culturally familiar form of the quipu, a recording device made from woven cords that has been used in the Andes for thousands of years. Gomez explained to me that the molecular quipu was intended to explain potato genetics to Quechua farmers and the public. Currently, it is featured in most regional potato agrobiodiversity catalogs, as a graphic that helps to explain each potato variety\u2019s unique genetic traits. The molecular quipu is one example of participatory research developed by CIP staff and is the result of community engagement with Andean communities.<\/p>\n Molecular Quipu in Junin Potato Catalog. Source: Minagri et al. 2017. Cat\u00e1logo de variedades de papa nativa del sureste del departamento de Jun\u00edn \u2013 Per\u00fa. Lima (Per\u00fa). Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Despite work by Gomez and others, in the past two decades, participatory research and community engagement at CIP had seemed at times fragmented and uncertain (Thiele et al. 2001). CIP is composed of many departments, among them CIP\u2019s genebank, that receives, curates, preserves and distributes plant genetic material (CIP\u2019s genebank website), and CIP\u2019s Social and Nutritional Science Department, thay plays an important role in engaging policy makers, researchers, and the private sector with conservation. While it is not common for CIP\u2019s genebank staff to interact with farmers, CIP\u2019s Social and Nutritional Science Department staff conducts participatory research with farmers. Through the interviews during my field work, I learned that even though CIP\u2019s genebank staff consider their work relevant for farmers, few of them had consistent interaction with them. However, CIP\u2019s genebank plays a fundamental role in the distribution of pathogen free material to farming communities and food security. Since I started my fieldwork in 2022, I noticed a more active involvement of CIP\u2019s genebank staff in farmers meetings and biodiversity monitoring activities, traveling with them outside Lima. Before I started my field work, CIP\u2019s genebank staff played an important role in a biodiversity monitoring project that included interacting with farmers from Pasco and Sierra de Lima to identify gaps in CIP\u2019s potato collection (CIP 2021).<\/p>\n AGUAPAN 10th Annual Meeting in Paucartambo, Cusco. 5 August 2024. Image by author.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n While collaboration between genebank scientists and farmers seems to be strengthening, the uncertainty of potato farming\u2019s future is rising. While the gastronomic boom of potato products is celebrated (Matta 2014, Garcia 2021, few discussions have emerged about potato production as a precarious and a labor-demanding process (Scott 2011, De Haan 2009, Tobin et al. 2016). The current lack of youth and women farmers in decision making is likely a consequence of years of men having leading roles in conservation, agriculture and household decisions. AGUAPAN, a national association of potato guardians, has attempted to engage younger generations in conservation. It also elected its first woman president in July 2024. Yet, the majority of the board members are older men. The farmers that I met and interviewed were all at least 50 years old and all were men. Through participant observation and interviews in Cusco, La Libertad, Huancayo, and Lima, I learned that it is not clear if rural youth are willing to do the same work as their parents, or if, instead, young farmers are willing to support their parents in other ways, such as commercialization in food fairs. Based on participant observation during potato guardian annual meetings, young farmers seem to be leaning towards commercialization and marketing activities.<\/p>\n CIP staff, agriculturalists, and conservation experts at the Native Potato Festival in Lima. 26-28 May 2023. Image by author.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In the case of potato conservation, farmers and curators are actors in knowledge infrastructures consisting of research facilities, regional potato catalogs, and digital platforms such as biodiversity apps. Knowledge infrastructures remain invisible or taken for granted until they are examined from within (Edwards 2010, Hine 2020). Science and technology studies (STS) scholars have used the term invisible labor in science to signal the role of experts that sustain knowledge infrastructures (Bangham et al. 2022). As actors in Andean conservation infrastructures, potato farmers and curators at CIP\u2019s genebank tend to remain invisible, even though their labor is complementary and sustains potato agrobiodiversity. Currently, farmers and CIP staff collaborate well, despite moments of uncertainty due to project decision making and funding as I observed during my field work.<\/p>\n Indigenous scholars have used the term Indigenous science to value the knowledge systems of Indigenous and rural smallholder communities (Hernandez 2022, Bang et al. 2018). The recognition of Indigenous and community knowledge systems as Indigenous science builds knowledge bridges between western and nonwestern science. This is exemplified by the case of Andean potatoes, since Quechua culture is embedded in potato taxonomy. At the same time, the work of Rene Gomez reminds us that there are interesting cases when the opposite happens and western science can promote Indigenous scientific understandings. For example, as the result of rural community engagement and applied conservation, tools such as the molecular quipu are created by scientists in order to bring western and non-western knowledge into conversation. The next generation of potato conservationists\u2014from CIP researchers to Indigenous and other smallholder potato farmers\u2014needs to foster these ties as well as build the foundations for sustainable agroecological practices and Andean food heritage.<\/p>\n CIP protects potato and Andean tubers that are in danger of disappearing or that are no longer available (Westengen et al. 2018). For example, since 1997, 89 farming communities have received over 6000 samples of cultivated potato from the CIP genebanks, comprising almost 30% of CIPs collection of native landraces (Gomez 2019).<\/p>\n Potato repatriation and dynamic conservation are concepts used by potato conservation and agriculture experts. While repatriation involves the reintroduction of landraces to Andean rural communities, dynamic conservation refers to the interactions between in situ (farm) and ex situ(lab) conservation strategies and how both complement each other. For more information, please see: L\u00fcttringhaus, S., et al. 2021.<\/p>\n This post was curated by Contributing Editor Cydney Seigerman<\/a>.<\/p>\n Bang, M, et al. 2018. If Indigenous Peoples Stand with the Sciences, Will Scientists Stand with Us?. Daedalus<\/em> 2018; 147 (2): 148\u2013159. doi: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/DAED_a_00498<\/cite><\/p>\n Bangham, J., Chacko, X., & Kaplan, J. (Eds.). (2022). Invisible Labor in Modern Science<\/em>. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.<\/cite><\/p>\n Campos, H., & Ortiz, O. (Eds.). (2020). The Potato Crop: Its Agricultural, Nutritional and Social Contribution to Humankind<\/em>. Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3- 030-28683-5<\/cite><\/p>\n CIP 2021. Monitoreo de la diversidad in situ y an\u00e1lisis de brechas gen\u00e9ticas de papas nativas en Per\u00fa para la conservaci\u00f3n complementaria ex situ<\/a><\/em>. Centro Internacional de la Papa. De Haan, S. (2009). Potato diversity at height: Multiple dimensions of farmer-driven in-situ conservation in the Andes<\/em>. Wageningen University.<\/cite><\/p>\n De Haan, S., Burgos, G., Liria, R. et al. (2019). The Nutritional Contribution of Potato Varietal Diversity in Andean Food Systems: a Case Study. Am. J. Potato Res<\/em>. 96, 151\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12230-018-09707-2<\/cite><\/p>\n Edwards, P. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming<\/em>. MIT Press.<\/cite><\/p>\n Ellis, D., Salas, A., Chavez, O., Gomez, R., Anglin, N. (2020). Ex Situ Conservation of Potato [SolanumSection Petota (Solanaceae)] Genetic Resources in Genebanks. In: Campos, H., Ortiz, O. (eds) The Potato Crop. Springer, Cham<\/em>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-28683-5_4<\/cite><\/p>\n Garcia, M. E. (2021). Gastropolitics and the Specter of Race: Stories of Capital, Culture, and Coloniality in Peru.<\/em> University of California Press.<\/cite><\/p>\n Gomez, R. 2019. Conservaci\u00f3n din\u00e1mica de germoplasma. In situ y ex situ. Curso de Capacitaci\u00f3n Manejo Integrado del Cultivo de Papa, 1-5 Abril, 2019. Lima (Peru): Centro Internacional de la Papa. 51 p.<\/cite><\/p>\n Hernandez, J. 2022. Fresh Banana Leaves: Healing Indigenous Landscapes thorough Indigenous Science<\/em>. North Atlantic Books.<\/cite><\/p>\n Hine, C. (2020). Knowledge infrastructures for citizen science. In P. Hetland, P. Pierroux, & L. Esborg, A History of Participation in Museums and Archives<\/em> (1st ed., pp. 93\u2013108). Routledge.<\/cite><\/p>\n Huam\u00e1n, Z., Schmiediche, P. (1999). The potato genetic resources held in trust by the International Potato Center (CIP) in Peru. Potato Res<\/em> 42, 413\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02358158<\/cite><\/p>\nConservation Assemblages: Participatory Research, Ex Situ and In Situ Andean Potato Conservation<\/h2>\n
![\"The](\"http:\/\/blog.castac.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/Fig1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Six](\"http:\/\/blog.castac.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/Fig3sm.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Two](\"http:\/\/blog.castac.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/Fig2sm.jpg\")
<\/p>\nFootnotes<\/h2>\n
References<\/h2>\n
<\/cite><\/p>\n