Google\u2019s AI-generated reviews are changing how people find and consume information. This shift raises a pressing question: Does this new feature pose an existential threat to publishers who rely on search traffic? The reality is that some of them have lost 40-95% of their traffic<\/a>.<\/p>\n Google\u2019s AI Review Summaries feature provides concise AI-generated summaries of user reviews for products, services, and businesses directly within search results.\u00a0<\/p>\n These summaries aim to enhance user experience by offering quick insights without the need to navigate multiple pages.<\/p>\n That is a great goal to improve a user-friendly web. But there are costs. Digital media publishers are the canon fodder.<\/p>\n The open web and social media platforms had an unwritten contact at the start of the social media revolution to give everyone who contributed to their platforms a free voice to reach the world.\u00a0<\/p>\n The first few years delivered on that promise. Bloggers, content creators, influencers and media publishers were able to reach the 5 billion plus online users and bypass the mass media gatekeepers.\u00a0<\/p>\n Then the social media platforms and Google became the new gatekeepers. New algorithms were introduced to maximize ad revenue and the result minimized the reach of the contributors who created content for free. Their attention and traffic were sacrificed to the mega platforms. Bloggers, media companies and content providers were the sacrificial lambs.\u00a0<\/p>\n Now there is a\u00a0 new tech that takes the stealing of free content to new levels. Artificial intelligence and chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google\u2019s Genesis.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n What we didn\u2019t know back then when we started blogs (that\u2019s me in 2009), as media and news sites, was that we had struck a Faustian bargain<\/a> (A pact whereby a person trades something of supreme importance, such as content, for some worldly or material benefit). And in a world of the web that means attention, traffic and money,<\/p>\n So what is the impact of Google\u2019s AI review summaries?<\/p>\n PR spin is a great way to paint an existential crisis as an opportunity. Is faster better? Google seems to think so but at what cost?\u00a0<\/p>\n The numbers tell a story that reveals publisher sites dependence on search with Google almost holding a monopoly. The reality is that Google is not a publisher\u2019s friend. Any public company (that includes Meta and Google) has a commitment to maximize profit for its shareholders.\u00a0<\/p>\n The algorithm upgrades started with changes that put advertisements at the top of search results, then we had the addition of snippets that took more traffic away and now we are at AI Review summaries.\u00a0<\/p>\n We are now at the sharp end of \u201cEnshittification<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0 What does that mean?<\/p>\n \u201cFirst, platforms (Facebook and Google are an example) are good to their users (free attention); then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers (Cheap advertising); finally, they abuse those business customers (increase the ad prices to high levels) to claw back all the value for themselves (Make astronomical profits),<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Here is what the new algorithm changes including AI reviews looks like for these 5 publishers. Visibility is down from 40% for Forbes and 95% for the publisher: \u201cTime Stamped.\u201d<\/p>\n There are many stakeholders in the global web game and a pact that is a win-win will keep it healthy and flourishing. But it is starting to fray.\u00a0<\/p>\n Google\u2019s algorithm changes in the past have provided traffic whiplash as they experiment with making their product more user friendly (they call it better user experience without any thought to their stakeholders that are providing traffic for free).\u00a0<\/p>\n Or should we say that it is more about making their search more profitable or money grabbing.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n So what is next for publishers and Google?<\/p>\n As Google\u2019s AI Reviews threaten traditional search-driven traffic, publishers need to rethink their content distribution strategies. The open social web movement and protocols like ActivityPub<\/a> (more on that later) and the Fediverse<\/a> offer an opportunity to regain control over their audiences. Here\u2019s how:<\/p>\n The open social web refers to decentralized, federated networks where users and publishers interact without a central platform (like Google or Facebook) dictating content distribution. By shifting focus from search traffic to direct engagement, publishers can:<\/p>\nWhat are Google AI-generated reviews?<\/h2>\n
Why it matters<\/h2>\n
The new digital gatekeeper: AI\u00a0<\/h2>\n
\n
Driving the news<\/h2>\n
\n
By the numbers<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
What they\u2019re saying<\/h3>\n
\n
What\u2019s next<\/h2>\n
\n
How can publishers adapt and survive?<\/h2>\n
1. Embrace the open social web for direct audience engagement<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com\/docsz\/AD_4nXeGdKbhWOKfItHNi94ZdRnChvg7fe3L-nMWfZ6Ue6uUAIYkpeWqBIru8jEHPBn7Bh-OrjJn6Hep8un6mmkcYc6lR5_DHy_zE4wPgBBN3XgnvvoxGHQot1T0jbgQK-KRR_6NPTz4IQ?key=pcyswoRa-H5M_9qSufXtOncQ\"\/)
![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com\/docsz\/AD_4nXeGdKbhWOKfItHNi94ZdRnChvg7fe3L-nMWfZ6Ue6uUAIYkpeWqBIru8jEHPBn7Bh-OrjJn6Hep8un6mmkcYc6lR5_DHy_zE4wPgBBN3XgnvvoxGHQot1T0jbgQK-KRR_6NPTz4IQ?key=pcyswoRa-H5M_9qSufXtOncQ\")